Comparative Financial Analysis Of Bega Cheese Ltd And Bellamy’s Australia Ltd

Equity Analysis

The focus of this assessment lies in analysis of the financial statements of two companies which are engaged in same industry. The company which are considered for this assessment are Bega Cheese Ltd and Bellamy’s Australia Ltd which are both engaged in providing the customers with consumer staple food products. The assessment systematically shows comparative study of the financial elements which are shown in the annual report of the companies for a period of 3 years. The assessment shows increase or decrease in different aspects of the business during the three years frame.

Save Time On Research and Writing
Hire a Pro to Write You a 100% Plagiarism-Free Paper.
Get My Paper

Bega Cheese Ltd is engaged in dairy business and predominantly engages in its business operations in New South Wales of Australia. The company was initially founded as dairy supplying business or as an agriculture cooperative in Australia. The company is regarded to be the leading brand which produces cheese in the country. It is estimated that half of the revenues of the company is generated with the different varieties of cheese products which is offered by the business (Bega Cheese Ltd. 2018). The company in 2017 has acquired the business of Mondelez International which has extensive grocery and dairy business both in Australia and New Zealand. The company has therefore added the popular products such as Vegemite and Bonox thus providing the business more scope for profitability.

Bellamy’s Australia Ltd is one of the largest Australia food and beverage company and the company is regarded to be the best and largest in organic infant formula production which are in high demand among the consumers. The company has its headquarters in Australia and has operational sites in about 8 other places (Bellamy’s Australia Ltd  2018). The company has an excellent distribution system which it utilizes effectively for distributing its products across stores, pharmacy and direct customer through online sales.

The assessment goes into details regarding the equity position of the business and any changes in the same during the three years period (Brochet, Jagolinzer and Riedl 2013). The report also looks into the cash flow statement which is prepared by the businesses and also accounting for taxes for the current year.

The owner’s equity represents the equity capital which is utilized by the business for managing the day to day operations which is associated with the business. The owner’s equity of a business is represented in the balance sheet of the business. The analysis is to be conducted for both the companies on the basis of the information which is shown in the annual reports of the business for the last three years. As per the annual reports of Bega Cheese ltd for 2017, the three elements which are shown in the owner’s equity section are share capital, reserves and retained earnings (Vismara 2016). The share capital of the business shows the capital which the business is able to accumulated by issues of shares and securities of the business. As per the annual report of 2015, the share capital of the business is shown to be $ 103.942,000 which is shown to be $ 224,692,000 for the year 2017. The increase in the share capital of the business suggest that the business has issued new shares and the same has been issued in 2017 itself. The increase in share capital also indicates that the liquidity position of the business has improved significantly during the period. The reserve and retained earning balance which is shown in the balance sheet represent a part of the profits which the company retains for the purpose of meeting any emergency or even financing the fund requirements of the business (Thirumalaisamy 2013). The reserve balance and the retained earnings balance of the business is shown to have increased significantly during the year 2017. The increase in reserves and retained earnings of the business can be considered to be a positive sign for the business as this suggest that the profitability of the business has increased significantly over the years.

Save Time On Research and Writing
Hire a Pro to Write You a 100% Plagiarism-Free Paper.
Get My Paper

Capital Structure Analysis

The annual report of Bellamy’s Australia Ltd shows that the business has share capital, reserves and retained earnings as shown in the annual report of the business. The share capital of the company for the year 2015 is shown to be $ 39,655,000 and the equity share capital is shown to have increased significantly during the year 2017 and the same is shown to be $ 53,795,000. This shows that the business has issued new shares during the year and the rise in share capital is consistent on year to year basis which shows that the management of the company relies more on equity capital for the purpose of meeting the financial requirements of the business (Tandon and Malhotra 2013). The reserves and retained earnings figure of the business has also increased significantly as per 2017 analysis which is clear indicator that the business of Bellamy’s Australia ltd is performing efficiently while meeting the expectations of the shareholders of the company.

The capital structure of the business is an important consideration for formulating the strategies of the business. The capital structure of a business is made of equity capitals and debt capital. The mixture of equity and debt capital differs from company to company. The capital structure of Bega Cheese ltd shows that the business has the policy of using both equity and debt capital in meeting the financial requirements of the business (Serfling 2016). The debt capital of the business for the year 2017 is shown to be $ 215,280,000 which was just $ 47,500,000 in 2016. The debt capital of the business has increased during the year and so has the equity capital which is used by the business (Antão and Bonfim 2014). The capital structure mix for the company shows that the managements wants a balanced capital structure which is made of oth equity and debt caapit.

On the other hand, Bellamy’s Australia Ltd shows a capital structure which signifies that the management of the company utilizes both equity and debt capital (Jõeveer 2013). The borrowings of the business for the year 2016 is shown to be $ 130,000 and the same is shown to have increased significantly to $ 25,264,000 for the year 2017. The increase in debts of the business is done to meet the expenses of the business and the profit and loss statement also shows that the business has incurred significant amount of losses in current year. The capital structure of the business is dominated by equity share capital and a minor portion is contributed by debt capital.

Cash Flow Analysis

On the basis of the discussion which is provided above, a comparative analysis can be conducted. The management of Bega Cheese ltd prefers more of a balanced capital structure whereas the business of Bellamy’s Australia Ltd relies more on utilization of equity capital in order to meet the financial requirements of the business.

The cash flow statement which is prepared by the business are mainly prepared by businesses for the purpose of analyzing the cash position of the business and also identify the cash inflows and outflows of the business. The cash flow statement of Bega Cheese ltd for the year 2017 comprise of cash from operating activities, cash from investing activities and cash from financial activities (Barth 2013). The cash flow statement of the business shows favorable conditions. The cash flow statement of Bellamy’s Australia ltd is not showing a favorable position as the cash and cash equivalent balance is shown to have decreased from the previous year and the same suggest that the liquidity of the business has decreased.

Both the companies show that the main receipts from operating activities of the business is through sale of the products to customers and the main cash outflow is shown to be related to the payments which is made to the suppliers and employees of the business. The cash from investing activities of the business mainly comprise of purchases and sales of assets which are undertaken by the business during the year (Balsari and Varan 2014). The cash flow from financing activities of the business for both the companies shows the shares which the management of the company has undertaken during the year and also the borrowings which is taken by the business during the year. The cash flow statement of both the companies are prepared following the conceptual framework which are commonly followed by most of the businesses.

As per the cash flow statement of Bega Cheese Ltd for the year 2017 the major cash inflows from operating activities of the business is the cash receipts from customers of the business which is shown to be $ 1,274,872,000 for the year 2017 and the same is shown to have increased significantly. Similarly, the cash outflow of the business is the payments which is made to suppliers and employees of the business. The cash from operating activities of the business is shown to be positive which is good sign for the business. The cash from investing activities of the business shows that the main cash inflows is through the sales of property, plant and equipment and the main outflows is shown to be purchase payments for intangible assets and other listed shares. The cash flow from financing activities of the business mainly comprise of loans proceeds which is taken by the business and the new equity shares which is issued by the business. A graph is presented below which shows the cash flows of the business:

Particular

2015

2016

2017

Net cash flows from operating activities

-$ 17,345.00

 $ 58,980.00

 $   57,074.00

Net cash flows used in investing activities

-$ 36,416.00

-$ 39,634.00

 $ 151,257.00

Net cash flows used in financing activities

 $ 35,415.00

-$ 19,972.00

 $ 257,544.00

Conclusion

The above graph effectively shows the cash position of the business for the three years period. In 2017, the bar graphs are shown to be positive which is a favorable sign for the business. The comparison also shows that the business has significantly improved from the position it was in 2015 and 2016.

As per the cash flow statement of Bellamy’s Australia Ltd, the main cash flows from operating activities of the business is from the cash receipts from the customers which is shown to be $ 237,018,000. The cash outflow from operating activities is through cash payments to suppliers which is shown to be $ 269,433,000 for the year 2017. The cash payments is shown to be more than the cash inflows of the business which is the main reason for negative balances. The cash generated from investing activities of the business mainly comprise of cash from sales of property, plant and equipment and also investments. The main cash outflow is shown to be payments for purchases of properties and also intangibles during the period. The cash from financing activities shows that the company mainly relies on debt capital and also issues certain equity shares to accumulate funds for the business. A graphical presentation of the cash position of the business is shown below:

Particular

2015

2016

2017

Net cash flows from operating activities

 $   4,740.00

 $  8,895.00

 $ -45,719.00

Net cash flows used in investing activities

 $    -387.00

 $ -2,402.00

 $      -472.00

Net cash flows used in financing activities

 $ 23,248.00

 $ -6,230.00

 $  31,173.00

The above graph shows analysis of the cash from three activities of the business for the last three years period. The cash flow of the business is shown to have decreased in the current year in comparison to previous year which needs to be considered by the management of the company.

The cash flow statement of both the companies which is presented above shows that Bega Cheese ltd has a favorable cash position as all the activities of the business is able to generate cash inflows for the business which is a positive for the business. The capital structure which is utilized by the business is also shown to be appropriate. On the other hand, the cash flow statement of Bellamy shows in appropriate cash flows during the period. The cash from operating activity is shown to be negative which shows operational weakness of the business and also shows that the management is struggling to keep the liquidity of the business.

The comprehensive items which are shown in the profit and loss statement of Bega Cheese ltd for the year 2017 consist of hedge cash flows and change in values of financial assets of the business. On the other hand, the items which are included in the profit and loss statement of Bellamy’s Australia Ltd are hedge cash flow items and exchange difference which arises from translation of fully owned foreign entities.

The comprehensive items of a business are shown separately as they are of extraordinary nature and does not form part of the ordinary business transactions of the business (Duran and Lozano-Vivas 2013). These items are separately shown either in income statement or in a separate statement.

The comprehensive items show that the both the companies have made investments in hedge contracts in order to avoid the risk of fluctuations in foreign exchanges (Firescu 2015). The cash flow from hedge contracts has increased for Bega Cheese ltd for the year as shown in the financial statement of the company. On the other hand, Bellamy’s Australia ltd also shows an improvement in hedge contracts of the business. Both the business shows increase in comprehensive items in comparison to previous year figures.

The items which are included in the comprehensive income statement are not regular in nature and therefore the same should not be included in the decision-making process of the business. The items fluctuate year to year but the same are not considered in taking decisions.

The tax expense which is shown in the profit and loss statement of the business for the year 2017 is shown to be $ 59,290,000 and the same is shown to have significantly increased during the period.

The tax expenses of the business for the year 2017 for Bellamy’s Australia Company is shown to be $ 131,000 which is lower than previous year due to the losses incurred by the business.

The effective tax rate of Bega Cheese is shown to be higher as the effective tax rate of Bellamy’s Australia Ltd is shown to be negative due to the huge loss incurred by the business during the year.

The financial statements which is shown for the both the companies for the year 2017 shows there is no deferred tax assets for both the companies (Laux 2013). The deferred tax liabilities of both the companies is shown to have increased in 2017 which shows that the tax liabilities of the business have increased during the previous year.

Computation of Effective Tax Rate

$

$

Particulars

Bega Cheese Ltd

Bellamy’s Australia Ltd

Income Tax Provison

 $    59,290,000.00

 $                      131,000.00

Add: Increase in DTL

 $                            –   

 $                                        –   

Less: Increase in DTA

 $       5,843,000.00

 $                   2,037,000.00

Add: Taxes on Finance Costs

 $          967,800.00

 $                      381,000.00

Cash Tax amount

 $    54,414,800.00

-$                  1,525,000.00

EBIT

 $  201,264,000.00

 $                      593,000.00

Cash Tax Rate

27.04%

-257.17%

The cash tax rate considers only cash expenses of the business and does not considers the non-cash items for the computations. The computation also considers changes in deferred tax assets and deferred tax liabilities for the purpose of computing cash tax rate of the business.

Conclusion

The above analysis shows detail insights on the annual reports which is prepared by the business both the companies. The items which are included in the annual reports are thoroughly analyzed in order to understand which company is performing better. The cash position of Bega Cheese is much better than Bellamy’s Australia Ltd which shows that Bega cheese ltd has grown tremendously over the three years period while the management of Bellamy’s Australia Ltd needs to improve the cash position of the business.

Reference

Antão, P. and Bonfim, D., 2014. The dynamics of capital structure decisions.

Balsari, C.K. and Varan, S., 2014. IFRS implementation and studies in Turkey. Accounting and Management Information Systems, 13(2), p.373.

Barth, M.E., 2013. Measurement in financial reporting: The need for concepts. Accounting Horizons, 28(2), pp.331-352.

Bega Cheese Ltd. 2018.  – AnnualReports.com. [online] Available at: https://www.annualreports.com/Company/bega-cheese-ltd [Accessed 26 Sep. 2018].

Bellamy’s Australia Ltd – AnnualReports.com. 2018. Annualreports.com. Retrieved 26 September 2018, from https://www.annualreports.com/Company/Bellamys-AustraliaLtd

Brochet, F., Jagolinzer, A.D. and Riedl, E.J., 2013. Mandatory IFRS adoption and financial statement comparability. Contemporary Accounting Research, 30(4), pp.1373-1400.

Duran, M.A. and Lozano-Vivas, A., 2013. Off-balance-sheet activity under adverse selection: The European experience. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 85, pp.176-190.

Firescu, V., 2015. Comprehensive income, a new dimension in performance measurement and reporting. Procedia Economics and Finance, 20, pp.218-223.

Jõeveer, K., 2013. Firm, country and macroeconomic determinants of capital structure: Evidence from transition economies. Journal of Comparative Economics, 41(1), pp.294-308.

Laux, R.C., 2013. The association between deferred tax assets and liabilities and future tax payments. The Accounting Review, 88(4), pp.1357-1383.

Serfling, M., 2016. Firing costs and capital structure decisions. The Journal of Finance, 71(5), pp.2239-2286.

Tandon, K. and Malhotra, N., 2013. Determinants of stock prices: Empirical evidence from NSE 100 companies. International Journal of Research in Management & Technology (IJRMT), ISSN, pp.2249-9563.

Thirumalaisamy, R., 2013. Firm Growth and Retained Earnings Behavior–A Study on Indian Firms. European journal of business and management, 5(57), pp.40-57.

Vismara, S., 2016. Equity retention and social network theory in equity crowdfunding. Small Business Economics, 46(4), pp.579-590.