Creating Growth Platforms

GE Company was founded through a merging of two firms Thomas Edison’s electronics light firm with the Thomas Houston firm. It involved in business related to that of Edison’s patents involving mostly electricity equipment and supplying electric vehicles and light bulbs. Throughout the 20th century GE Company was considered the largest industrial company in the world and also as one of the perfect of management (Lohr 2018). The GE Company that was inherited by Immelt in 2001 was considered as one of the highly valued and successful corporations in the world (CNN  n.d) . Combining massive size with constant adaptation was their key to their achievement. The company modified both its corporate set and its organizational structures to the demand and chances of bringing a change everywhere.

1.For the company to move GE for better growth, it needs to withdraw from low-growth businesses, and redirect funds to business with strong growth predictions, and start new activities. To restructure GE business portfolio higher growth, the important theme was the creation of growth platforms, by either extending the existing business or starting a new business (Lohr 2018).  Recognizing fresh growth stands was the essential unplanned problem for GE’s business.  GE Company’s growth mostly engaged in already existed businesses activity where there was a possibility to seriously enlarge its business’s market existence (Owles 2017).

In the field of medical care, GE was considered the top worldwide in analytical imaging, ICT scanners, X-ray apparatus and MRI (Lohr 2018). During the management of Immelt was considered as the key area of growth for GE, growing their services and their geographical presence (Immelt et al n.d). GE’s major accessions were Amersham, diagnostics and medical equipment company based in the UK and about diagnostics which are the best in the word to provide in-vitro diagnostics (Ted and McGrane 2015).

One of the eldest dealings of GE was power generation. GE had established promising business supply oil and gas sector with apparatus (Reuters 2018). As the manager, Immelt considered energy as an attractive growth stand for GE (Immelt et al n.d). Alternative energy was the important growth part of its major acquisitions being Enrons wind energy business, Chevron Texaco coal gasification business, and Astropower, which was best in supplying solar energy products. The acquisition of Alstom made GE to be the undisputed word best in turbines. It was also established as the main player in supplying oilfield equipment and services (Owles 2017). 

In the area of broadcast and entertaining, GE made an extension of its performing events past their NBC broadcasting and cable TV activities (Owles 2017). Their major acquisition included Telemundo, this made GE become the Spanish language highly growing market for broadcasting, and Vibendi universals entertainment fitted in Immelt’s recognition of GE Company to have high technology industrialized corporation (Lohr 2018). Due to this, they combined Comcast cable TV channels with NBC universal with the novel business 49% was possessed by GE Company and 51% owned by Comcast Company, in the year 2011, Comcast Company bought out GE’s remaining 49% stake (Gara 2017).

GE’s Expansion in Medical Care

Technology and infrastructure: infrastructure was the most important area of Immelt’s growth initiatives (Immelt et al n.d). GE established new platforms like safety structures, aerospace and water treatment. This is where GE built a strong stand in a aircraft engine to expand into avionics where they had Smiths Aerospace as their main acquirement. All business areas where growth and income predictions were low divestment were done such as domestic applications. Even those did not suitable with GE’s competences or its running method like NBC universal the same was done (Hamel 2012, pp. 56). The company also withdrew some business, mainly particularly plastics, where the high petroleum prices would lead to limited growth prospects and where it had no serious mass of the major petrochemical companies (Reuters 2018).

Immelt came under financial crisis which created a crucial force to contract GE capital’s assets. This was done by dropping its loan disclosure, growing its liquidity, advance its liquidity, develop its danger outline, and state its part within GE (Owles 2017).  Progressively, GE capital was considered as a dealer of dedicated economic services with a specific importance on middle market leasing and lending, funding in GE areas and a limited other special finance parts.

Immelt recognized technology as the major promoter of GE’s expected growth. He gave emphasis on the importance of changing the corporate R&D center to a scholarly hothouse and to fasten the interior spread of new technologies. Immelt’s obligation to technology was identified by increasing company’s R&D finances (Immelt et al n.d). He started this with a $100 million promoting to GE’s company R&D centre in Niskayuni, Munich, and Rio de Janeiro (Global R&D n.d). In  2015, GE had about 37,000 technology workers in R&D across its business and its eight world study centers in China, Israel, US, Germany, India and Brazil (Global R&D n.d).

The management of Immelt, the company mostly concentrated its researchers on their fewer, larger, long-term programs (Immelt et al n.d). The emphasis was revealed in the company’s progressive technology platforms in diagnostics and molecular imaging, nanotechnology, energy conversion, sustainable energy and advanced propulsion (Global R&D n.d).

Immelt launched a program called ecomagination in 2005 (Chesbrough 2012, pp. 141). It was a package of products and business improvement at GE’s obligation to addressing problems such as, more effective sources of energy, cleaners, and low emissions. The ecomagination platform created backing and harmonization for emerging ecologically friendly goods and industry results across GE’s trade divisions. GE company generated $21 billion of clean energy revenue in 2011 (Chesbrough 2012, pp. 142).

GE’s Success in Power Generation

It more theorized its technological attention and its model during the period from 2013-2015 (Hill et al. 2014, pp. 44). It defined its R&D emphasis as advance inventions in parts of diagnostic and molecular imaging, advanced propulsion, energy conversion, nanotechnology, and security technologies (Brem and Ivens 2013, pp. 32). Since 2013 the company was using this term, the industrial internet which referred to the connection between large data analytics (Weinstein and Winston 2016, pp. 14). This created opportunities for every GE’s business by use of locomotive, fixed sensors on its jet engines, electricity generators, oil and gas equipment, health care equipment to connect with software that control maintenance plans, energy optimization, plant automation, enterprise controlling and accident prevention (Owles 2017).

GE advancement locomotive encompassed 6.7 miles of wiring and 250 radars with nine million figures points per hour providing input for software gears such as trip optimizer (real-time guidance to train drivers on fuel economy) remote diagnostics (predicting equipment failures and scheduling maintenance), yard planner (to speed the breakup, sorting, and reformation of trains), and movement planner (to optimize the movement of trains on individual tracks and rail networks) (Lohr 2018).

Throughout his career at GE, Immelt had mostly focused on the building their relationship with customers, the value of spending more time with customers, customer orientation and working on the problems facing the customers. After he took over as CEO, Immelt has mostly put more emphasis on the importance of customer attention (Owles 2017).

The company’s high customer focus was created through more investment in company’s marketing activities, including employing most marketing executives with talents and emerging process for finding fresh products and service offering unmet needs for a customer. This was done through pushing foods with providing service to giver custom-made solutions; Expanding customer range included technical services, financial services and training (Lohr 2018). To adventure fresh prospects in the company’s current divisional arrangement, the company started to make cross-business, high-visibility marketing campaigns. Immelt introduced a program of growing GE’s capability to attend clients well (Reuters 2018).

2.The 21^st century requirements were very crucial in laying down the company’s strategy. Putting GE Company in a position to be able to compete in rising developing markets became a crucial tactical importance in GE Company (Hamel 2012, pp. 59). Immelt appointed vice chairman John Rice as the leader of company’s international growth efforts, with emphasizing particularly on highly growing markets such as India, China,Brazil and the Middle East. A well-co-ordinated method across GE’s business was required in order to maximize GE’s potential in these markets.

GE’s Infrastructure Initiatives

The integrated method which required working directly with governments was made formal in the year 2009 as a company to country strategy. The top targets for GE in 2012 were China, India and Brazil while Nigeria was there next billion-dollar country (Owles 2017). Immelt came up with an idea of internalization where he expected products growth and a renovation of its product and services to meet needs in the local market. GE’s was used to its traditional approach where they produced products for US markets, then produce simple, less cost varieties to evolving markets (Reuters 2018). Merging both the two approaches, traditional and growing customer focused on a consumer-optimization method to merchandise advancement in which native firms had freedom of adapting and inventing products for their market (Lohr 2018).The reverse innovation was the consequence; more product ideas were developed to address the needs of the evolving market customer were to be later used to GE’s customers of the developed countries (Brem and Ivens 2013, pp. 35). In the process of exploiting worlds chances resulted to a globalized GE and its ability base. The command center of GE health centre were transferred to the UK; in the year 2011 x-ray activities were transferred to Beijing, China from Wisconsin 

In 2005, there was standardization of its customer’s fulfilment metrics, which focused on net promoter totals. This is the percentage of the total number of clients who endorse GE as a friend minus the percent who would not recommend. Immelt had a goal t of achieving a closer combination of a more developed technology within the company. This was import to grow technology spread throughout its business and from corporate R&D to the business. This was meant to share and access the same technology, markets, structure and intellect in every business of GE (Reuters 2018).  

Immelt preferred GE’s diversified portfolio of business to bring stability to the business cycle. This diversity strengthens through disrupting actions and product cycle, hence creating a major basis of value from a multi-business company (Reuters 2018). Immelt mostly concentrated in managing the firm for the lasting incomes development which would then determine the price of the stock. There was a serious problem of the trade setting in the 21st century; Immelt had to find the possible source of revenue for GE Company (Reuters 2017). During the period of Welch management of the company, it formed value by lowering cost, elimination of assets not performing and discovering the chances given by economic services. All these sources of income had been extracted.

Immelt’s Focus on Technology

Due to these problems of the 21st century, GE Company’s financial presentation had come down. Immelt targeted GE sales were growing at the rate of 2-3 times that of worldwide GDP, incomes were growing at the rate of10% plus and return on the capital was 20% plus (Owles 2017). Its performance did not meet these targets. Immelt always had been disturbed by the question whether if the company is broken up altogether shareholders would be better off.

Immelt dedicated GE to an overall progress rate of 8% per year where under the management of welch it was 5% per year. This 8% rate of growth of revenue was from the indication that GE growth to range amid two to three times that of globe GDP (Reuters 2018). The growth of profit would be faster than that of revenues, due to reduced over-all and managerial costs as a percentage of transactions and higher differences resulting from novel goods and services. From 2002 to 2007 GE Company easily realized its objectives (Reuters 2018). The company’s incomes were growing at the rate of 13% per annum and its operating earnings at the rate of 14%. (Reuters 2018). And later revenues and profits shrank sharply and there was no more growth

So as to place the company for stronger growth, it was required to exit businesses with slow-growth and direct incomes to businesses with strong growth predictions and start a new business.  Immelt considered extending the existing business or entirely starting a new area of business. Identification of new growth stands was the most strategic problem for GE’s business (Haines 2016, pp. 9). 

The main aim of Immelt was to reinvent GE and more so reinventing the management model of the diversified corporation (Hill et al. 2014, pp. 42).  Immelt’s strategies brought a lot of change in GE Company. During the error of Welch, he had divided up GE’s main business parts into smaller segments. Immelt came in and GE was reorganized into small broad-based sectors, in order to create a more cross-business integration. This reorganization reduced the number of business parts from 12 to 5, before it was reorganized further to 9 (Reuters 2017).

Immelt had interested to make value by these parts of GE working together, very closely and very efficiently, where managers will work cross-function, cross-region, and cross-company.  Implementation of this Immelt’s strategic idea of GE basing on the technology, customer value, and growth-concerned industrial powerhouse resulted to organizational systems changes, its management growth and appraisal structure, marketing and technology functions and other changes which caused changes to GE’s organization, coordination, and practices with the planned strategy (Haines 2016, pp. 12).

GE’s Customer Focus

The organizational consequences were complex. It required sales and marketing workers to concentrate on GE’s business and the opportunities available. This resulted in complex problems of organization n expertise and incentives (McKiernan 2017, pp. 24).  The initiative to merge the transaction of curative imaging products together with consulting facilities resulted in a problem.  This was as a result of the sales of the medical equipment had little knowledge of the consulting services contributed to low sales. They were also unwilling in sharing their clients with sales workers from performance solutions.  Driving invention and customer alignment within GE required a level of collaboration across divisional borders that were not companionable with its system based on metrics of performance management and culture of internal competition (Hamel 2012, pp. 61). A comparatively poor performance was witnessed from 2010-2015 in the management system that Immelt had created at GE remained unconfirmed (Reuters 2017). 

GE’s traditional method was to produce for the US market, then to produce simpler products, fewer cost products versions to upcoming markets (Harrysson et al. 2012, pp. 82). After merging GE’s international concern with growing customer value contributed to a customer optimization approach to the development of the products. The native teams were given autonomy to adapt and develop products for their markets. This resulted in a reversed innovation (Wheelen et al. 2017, pp. 63). For a company to perform by combining innovation, efficiency and customer focus must be in a fast moving business environment (Cowley and Domb 2012, pp.13).

Due to growing customer value, there was rising venture in GE’s marketing activities, which involved employing most talented marketing workers and developing method to recognize fresh product and service offerings and identifying customer needs which have not yet met. Recognizing new products and identifying unmet needs for the customer at the same time was a hard task for marketing executives. For their work to be efficient, these tasks should be carried out at different times and by different people (Crew 2012, pp.40). 

Increased integration of GE’s different business created compound management difficulties. This created a change in the relationship for GE’s company headquarters and the business, where there are no strong divisions of roles between them.  CEOs had the responsibility to run their own companies both operationally and strategically. This lack of a central source of management caused business failure. Although integration is important, a business should be controlled and managed from one central point (Drucker 2014, pp. 24).

Meeting the Requirements of the 21st Century Business Environment

Conclusion

In conclusion, Immelt applied the best strategies and redirected them well to achieve the goals of the company. He only failed in a few ways. What should be realized is that for a company to perform, by combining innovation, efficiency and customer focus must be in a fast moving business environment (Denning 2017). And for greater integration in business, there must be a central point which controls, manages and run the businesses both operationally and strategically. 

References

Brem, A. and Ivens, B. (2013). Do frugal and reverse innovation foster sustainability? Introduction of a conceptual framework. Journal of Technology Management for Growing Economies, 4(2), pp.31-50.

Chesbrough, H. (2012). GE’s ecomagination challenge: an experiment in open innovation. California management review, 54(3), pp.140-154.

CNN. ( n.d).  General Electric Co. Available at: https://money.cnn.com/quote/profile/profile.html?symb=GE, , [Accessed on 25 April 2018].

Cowley, M. and Domb, E. (2012). Beyond strategic vision. Routledge, pp. 12-19.

Crew, M.A. ed. (2012). Regulation under increasing competition (Vol. 30). Springer Science & Business Media, pp. 39-45.

Denning. S.  (DEC, 2017). The Five New Forces In Innovation Strategy. Forbes. Available at: https://www.forbes.com/sites/stevedenning/2017/12/14/the-five-new-forces-in-innovation-strategy/#2669dd1f25be,  [Accessed on 25 April 2018].

Drucker, P. (2014). Innovation and entrepreneurship. Routledge, pp. 23-27.

Gara. A.  (JUN 2017). For GE’s Jeff Immelt, Hundreds Of Deals And $575 Billion Didn’t Yield A Higher Stock Price. Forbes. Available at:  https://www.forbes.com/sites/antoinegara/2017/06/15/for-ges-jeff-immelt-hundreds-of-deals-and-575-billion-didnt-yield-a-higher-stock-price/#322e02ea7226, [Accessed on 25 April 2018].

Global R&D. (n.d).  Fact Sheet. Available at :https://www.ge.com/about-us/ research/factsheet, [Accessed on 25 April 2018].

Haines, S. (2016). The systems thinking approach to strategic planning and management. CRC Press, pp. 7-16.

Hamel, G. (2012). What matters now: How to win in a world of relentless change, ferocious competition, and unstoppable innovation. John Wiley & Sons, pp. 55-65.

Harrysson, M., Metayer, E. and Sarrazin, H. (2012). How ‘social intelligence’can guide decisions. McKinsey Quarterly, 4, pp.81-89.

Hill, C.W., Jones, G.R. and Schilling, M.A. (2014). Strategic management: theory: an integrated approach. Cengage Learning, pp. 41-49.

Immelt J. R., Govindarajan,V and Trimble.C. (n.d).“How GE is Disrupting Itself,” Harvard Business Review (October 2009): 56–65

Lohr. S.  (April 20, 2018). G.E. Earnings Show Some Signs of a Turnaround. The New York Times. Available at: https://www.nytimes.com/2018/04/20/technology/ge-earnings.html?rref=collection%2Ftimestopic%2FGeneral%20Electric%20Company&action=click&contentCollection=business&region=stream&module=stream_unit&version=latest&contentPlacement=1&pgtype=collection, , [Accessed on 25 April 2018].

McKiernan, P. ed. (2017). Historical Evolution of Strategic Management, Volumes I and II . Taylor & Francis, pp. 22-33.

Owles. E (June 017). G.E.’s History of Innovation. The New York Times. Available at: https://www.nytimes.com/2017/06/12/business/general-electric-history-of-innovation.html, , [Accessed on 25 April 2018].

Reuters . (23 Apr 2018). General Electric Co (GE.N) .Available at: https://www.reuters.com/finance/stocks/company-profile/GE.N, [Accessed on 25 April 2018].

Reuters. (JULY 2017). GE closes Baker Hughes deal, becomes No. 2 oilfield service provider. Available at: https://www.reuters.com/article/us-baker-hughes-m-a-ge/ge-closes-baker-hughes-deal-becomes-no-2-oilfield-service-provider-idUSKBN19O1RJ, , [Accessed on 25 April 2018].

Ted. M, and McGrane. V, (April 2015). GE to Cash Out of Banking Business.THE WALL STREET JOURNAL. Available at: https://www.wsj.com/articles/ge-to-cash-out-of-banking-business-1428713151, [Accessed on 25 April 2018].

Weinstein, A. and Winston, W. (2016). Defining your market: winning strategies for high-tech, industrial, and service firms. Routledge, pp. 14-19.

Wheelen, T.L., Hunger, J.D., Hoffman, A.N. and Bamford, C.E. (2017). Strategic management and business policy. Pearson, pp. 61-71