New social groups formed behind bars

Discuss about the Criminal Justice for Social Inequalities and Prison Culture.

This essay deals with the effect of penal power and social inequalities on the prison culture of the Australian Judicial System. The institutional outlines of the Australian social inequalities have been altered due to a gradual increment in case of prison and jail population. A new social group has been generated behind the bar and the base of the same is distinguished in accordance with experience of incarceration, racial minorities and lower educational background. The reason behind the same is that the prisoners do not get an easy entry in the normal social life and they have to face lots of trouble due to the communication gap within the society. It has been observed that certain principles are acting as a driving force regarding the prison experience that are generated from one generation to others (Garland 2017). The main driving force to this effect is social and economic disadvantages and penal confinements.

In Australia, the rate of prisoners is quite high. However, inequality can be observed in the case of incarceration process and penal confinement. In case of the incarceration stage, it can be observed that the aboriginals and the Torres islanders have to face lots of trouble in these cases. In most of the cases, it has been observed that the aboriginals have to face more severe penalties and the extraordinary rate of incarceration made them quite habituated in the prison culture and serving time in prison is quite regular to them (Brown 2014).

The society has created great impression on the prison culture of a state. The intergenerational and cumulative nature of the social structure helps to instigate the reason of mass incarceration. It has been observed that the penal liabilities are imposed on the persons who are suffering from poverty and actions have been taken against them when they have failed to meet all the financial requirements. According to the intergenerational structure of the society, it has been observed that not only the individual who is going to jail suffers from prison pain, but their families have to face the pain too. All these societal disadvantages draw negative shape and practices in the prison. In the continents of Western Australia, it has been observed that one in every thirteen prisoners are from the aboriginal group and in the words of Gerry Georgatos (2016), one in four aboriginal citizen of Australia has to experience prison life. The most common thing regarding the aboriginal prisoners are that they are economically backward classes and they are culturally disconnected from the modern world (Nafstad 2017). Considering the rate of incarceration, the Western part of Australia is known as mother of all jailors. According to Cunneen, the aboriginal Australian has to face certain discriminatory things that forced them to commit suicide at a large level. Gosford has observed it that the aboriginal people have to face serious problems due to lack of opportunities and social isolation provides them negative prison experience to them.

Aboriginals and Torres Islanders face more severe penalties

The mentality of the Australians regarding the aboriginals is quite parochial in nature and therefore, they have to face troubles behind the bar also. The rate of custodial death is quite higher among the aboriginal tribes and it has been observed that the over-representation of aboriginal people drive the criminal justice system in Australia (Crewe 2015).

National Aboriginal and Islander Legal Services Secretariat (NAILSS) reflect the original atmosphere of the prison where the life of the aboriginals is filthy and they have no rights there (aic.gov.au 2017). On the other hand, it has been observed in the contents of Australia that the male prisoners overwhelm the prisons. Further, it has been observed that almost 90% of the prisoners are from aboriginal background. All the local jails have same conditions and it has been noticed that the penal process in case of the aboriginals are quite different compare to the other people of Australia. In the modern time, the rates of female prisoners are increased a lot and it has been observed that the incarceration rate of Australia has been gradually increased for the same. Society plays an important role in these cases. The family members of the prisoners are disadvantaged by the social inequalities cropped up in such situation. The effect of the social inequalities has been mentioned as under:

Social inequality is a curse that affects the entire society of a country. It restrains a certain classes of people from social and economical opportunities and it creates adverse situation for the democracy. However, according to the report published by OECD, the rate of social inequality is increasing and the negative impression of inequality can be observed in all the parts of the administration and the judicial structure (Western et al. 2015). Australia is recognized for its egalitarian tradition and the social inequality of this country has remained many people stunned. A hidden hatred can be observed in case of the aboriginal people in Australia and it has been observed that the white people of Australia are treating the aboriginals as illiterate and uneducated people and the aboriginals are become socially backward class. It has further been observed that the society is treating the prisoners indifferently (Travis, Western and Redburn 2014). Not only the prisoners who are suffering but the family members are also have to suffer lots of trouble to this aspect. In many cases, it has been observed that the family members of a convict could not get job in the continents of Australia. The society is also treating them in a different way.

Cultural disconnect leading to negative prison experiences

According to OECD, income inequality is another reason for the social practices. In addition to this, people from low educational qualification have to face the penal power in Australia. In the words of Western and Pettit (2016), the incarceration process is quite common for the socially backward classes. A clear margin has been drawn for the minorities, low-income capacity person and less educated people who are generally facing the incarceration process (Tasgin and Morash 2016). It has been observed that almost 45% prisoners are from the aboriginal category. It is an important fact that not only the aboriginals but all the other people who are coming under the purview of these elements have to face the penal powers. These social inequalities have forced the people of these category think that prison is a part of their life. Western and Pettit have called this provision as invisible and cumulative. The hidden hatred of the society against those prisoners and socially backwards classes is the main obstacle for their normal social interaction. The prisoners could not become a part of the workforce, they are not allowed to live their normal family life and they are restrained to work due to permanent blotting in their resumes. All these have made the process of incarceration a threat to their existence. In this report, the effect of penal powers and social inequalities on the prison life has been engraved. The most important highlight regarding this topic is the issue of racial and class disparity in case of the prison population. According to Western (2016), “Socioeconomic disadvantage, crime, and incarceration in the current generation undermine the stability of family life and material support for children. As adults, these children will be at greater risk of diminished life chances and criminal involvement and at greater risk of incarceration as a result. There were many examples that showed patterns of ethnicities and classes that were being incarcerated more compare to others”.  

A common pattern has been observed in the prisons of Australia regarding the prison culture. it has been observed that a new society has been formed behind the bar who are sharing their experience of poverty, racial minorities, low educational backgrounds and process of penal power for their incarceration (Fan 2017). It is a common process that the prisoners are not getting a fair chance for leading the common social lifestyles and restriction for job opportunities make them economically disadvantage group.

Negative impact on families

The influence of penal power is also important for the shape practice and experience in the prison. The rate of penal power can be observed in case of the lifestyle of formerly incarcerated people. It has been observed that the members of the former prisoners are not allowed to be appointed as an employee and the economic condition of those families were deteriorated in nature. it is a common fact that the economically backward classes are tried before the court on a major amount. However, influence of the penal power and social inequality make their lifestyle bitterer. Therefore, it can be stated that negative impression of the penal power and negative inequalities are deepen the absurdity and adversity for the prisoners. The intergenerational nature of the society is affecting the prisoners and their families (Marchetti and Anthony 2016).

It has been observed that the modern means of society instigates the unequal distribution and both the men and women are facing the problem regarding social inequalities and form separate group according to the prison experience. Race and social disparities are playing an important role in this case. It is a fact that the socially backward classes have to face the penal provision, but among the social backward also, the racial problem matters a lot. It has been observed in Australia that the aboriginals are suffering a lot due to the racial system (Alam and Imran 2015). It has further been observed that prison become a part of their life and in any case of criminal activities, the society is pointing their finger on the aboriginals. All these things make the family of the prisoners’ sufferer and the disadvantages are intersected by all societal adversities.

A crucial analysis has been made regarding the prison population of Australia and it has been observed that one million people out of total 23 million people are facing incarceration process. It has also been observed that among those prisoners, half are from the aboriginal group. This report makes it clear what is the actual condition of prison and society in Australia (Shilling 2017). The most shocking thing is that only three percent of the Australian population is contained of aboriginals and half of the total prisoners of Australia are from this category. The social policies towards these groups can be clarified through this report. In almost every portion of Australia is suffered by the social disparity. The number of aboriginal inmates is higher in the states of New South Wales, South Australia, Northern Territory and Western Australia.

Socioeconomic disadvantage, crime, and incarceration affecting family stability and material support

In Australia, most of the prisons are not rehabilitative in nature and the reoffending rates in the prisons are ensuring the fact that the criminal justice system has been diminished in those sectors. It has been observed that most of the prisoners are suffering from acute disadvantages and no reformation has been made to this effect. No restorative action has been made for the prisoners and weak points of the Criminal Justice System can be observed in Australia.

It has been observed that the penal powers of Australia are engaged in wrong ways and the minor classes have to face lots of dilemma regarding the same. The white dropouts in the chart reflect the remarkable growth of incarceration process. It has been observed from this chart that the black people are the main sufferer of the incarceration process. It is a fact that the rates of aboriginal prisoners are quite high in Australia. One of the reasons of the same is that the aboriginals are from the economically backward classes. They do not have sufficient money to feed them. When an aboriginal has been held liable for an offence, he is produced before the court. Due to weak financial condition, they could not meet the monetary penalties and therefore, they send behind the bar (Blossfeld et al. 2016). Further, proper implementation of the Juvenile Justice System could not be observed in case of the aboriginals and therefore, almost 6% of the aboriginal children have to gain prison experience in Australia.

Therefore, it can be stated that the adverse effect of the penal power and excessive social inequalities are mainly responsible for the fundamental injustice made against the aboriginal population. It has been observed that the aboriginals are the main sufferer in this incarceration process and they have to face lot of insecurities within the society. It has further been observed that the socially disadvantaged groups are mainly facing the prison experience and carelessness of the government is the main reason for the same. Social reform is necessary to bring a change to this effect and the law relating to the Criminal Justice System should be amended. Further, it can be stated that the penal powers of Australia should be changed and based on the grounds of humanity (Hurst, Gibbon and Nurse 2016). It is to be considered that most of the prisoners are from economically backward class and the nature and amount of fine should be sufficient for them. The response of the society should be reasonable for the prisoners and their families; else, the condition will be detrimental in near future.

Reference:

Aic.gov.au. (2018). [online] Available at: https://aic.gov.au/sites/default/files/publications/proceedings/downloads/11-munro.pdf [Accessed 21 Apr. 2018].

Alam, K. and Imran, S., 2015. The digital divide and social inclusion among refugee migrants: A case in regional Australia. Information Technology & People, 28(2), pp.344-365.

Blossfeld, H.P., Buchholz, S., Skopek, J. and Triventi, M. eds., 2016. Models of secondary education and social inequality: An international comparison. Edward Elgar Publishing.

Brown, Mark. 2014 Penal power and colonial rule. Routledge,

Crewe, B., 2015. Inside the belly of the penal beast: Understanding the experience of imprisonment. International Journal for Crime, Justice and Social Democracy, 4(1), pp.50-65.

Dudgeon, P., Milroy, J., Calma, T., Luxford, Y., Ring, I.T., Walker, R., Cox, A., Georgatos, G. and Holland, C., 2016. Solutions that Work: What the Evidence and Our People Tell Us: Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Suicide Prevention Evaluation Project Report. University of Western Australia.

Fan, B.W., 2017. A retrospective study of attitudes and triggers towards gambling of prisoners before their incarceration in Australia. International Gambling Studies, 17(3), pp.412-425.

Garland, D., 2017. Penal power in America: Forms, functions and foundations. Revista brasileira de ciências criminais, (129), pp.217-256.

Hurst, C.E., Gibbon, H.M.F. and Nurse, A.M., 2016. Social inequality: Forms, causes, and consequences. Routledge.

Marchetti, E. and Anthony, T., 2016. Sentencing Indigenous offenders in Canada, Australia and New Zealand.

Nafstad, I., 2017. Mark Brown, Penal Power and Colonial Rule.

Shilling, C., 2017. The body, class and social inequalities. In Equality, education, and physical education (pp. 55-73). Routledge.

Tasgin, S. and Morash, M., 2016. Social context, family process, and Turkish boys’ pathway to incarceration: an application of the age-graded theory of informal social control. International Journal of Comparative and Applied Criminal Justice, 40(4), pp.307-323.

Travis, J., Western, B. and Redburn, F.S., 2014. The growth of incarceration in the United States: Exploring causes and consequences.

Western, B., Braga, A.A., Davis, J. and Sirois, C., 2015. Stress and hardship after prison. American Journal of Sociology, 120(5), pp.1512-1547.