Discussion

Discuss about the Investigating Principles for Verbal and Non-Verbal Question.

Research mainly differs in a number of aspects but along with this, it comes up with some kinds of similarities. One of the important factor in data collection that is information is conduction of various kinds of research. Data can be easily be collected from a large number of sources like documents, workplace, a survey from the internet and various kinds of taped social interviews (Yu, Abdullah & Saat, 2014). Data collection can be defined as a proper kind of method which can be used for conducting various kinds of research. Collection of data can be defined as a complicated kind of task. For collection quality and quantity method of data collection, various researchers should have a proper kind of access to data which is needed for collecting information. Data can be easily collected from a number of sources like written documents, records, internet and interviews(Vanderhallen & Vervaeke, 2016). The ethical interview can be easily defined as a proper kind of methods which can be used for talking and listening to a large number of people. In other words, it can be defined as a proper kind of method which is used for collection of data from a large number of individuals by the help of conversation.

In the coming pages of the report, an idea has been provided regarding various kinds of interview techniques like structure, unstructured, semi-structured interview, and non-directive technique. After that various advantages of an interview like face to face data collection like accurate screening, the capability of verbal and non-verbal questions, keeping a focus, capturing individual emotion and behavior.

Interviews are considered to be a proper kind of methods by which they get involved and provide an idea regarding various kinds of available views. It is considered to be vital for various kinds of researchers to look for actual kind of interview (Woldie, Kebede & Tariku, 2015). An interview guide can be an important kind of component which is used for conducting various kinds of interviews. An interview guide comprises a list of question, topic, and issues which are used by various researchers (Vanderhallen & Vervaeke, 2016). As per WHO there is six kinds of steps for conducting an interview like identification of appropriate topic and related questions, deciding or setting up of the level of details, a draft of questions, the order of questions, list of any kind of prompt, the pilot of the list of questions.

Ethical Issues

While conducting interviews various kinds of ethical issues or problems can be easily encountered. Along with confidentiality is considered to be taken on top of the given priority. Respondents should not give any harm or damage in various kinds in which research can be done. It also provides some kind of idea regarding that various interviews do not use as a devious method of selling a large number of things. Explanation of purpose is mainly all about the inquiry of respondent (Sooniste et al., 2015). Assessment of risk is all about interview can easily put a certain number of ways for risk in some kind of terms like stress, legal kind of liabilities or political issues. Confidentiality generally reflects on the idea or extent in which various kinds of promises of confidentiality can be easily met. It merely focuses on the large number of fact which is not narrated on a regular interval of time.

Confidentiality: It is considered as a sensitive kind of factor in both kinds of the interview and various questions. Few kinds of people can come up openhearted in front of a large number of the audience (Vanderhallen & Vervaeke, 2016). Forgetting confidentiality and various kinds of suitable places an example can be taken of a classroom of the child. Qualitative kind of data which is obtained in various interviews is considered to be highly accessible in nature. As it comprises of the various verbal description which can be only once (Ward, Gott & Hoare, 2015). It is considered to be very important for taking care or maintaining the confidentiality of given records. It mainly focuses on the fact all the given records should be provided as there is no kind of source of information which needs to be identified properly.

Access to information: Whenever data collecting techniques are used whether, in a questionnaire or any kind of interview technique, it requires some kind of information which needs to be supplied by any kind of respondents. In this type of this information mainly depends on the kind or purpose of interviews along questionaries. The ultimate kind of issue or problem which is being encountered is a proper finding of the right type of respondent (Vanderhallen & Vervaeke, 2014). As soon as researchers have found out ways right kind of respondent he or she can easily find out some of the questions which can be oral or written and after that proper kind of answer is provided. Respondent should come up information or data which is being looked by researchers.

Type of interviews

Reliability: One of the main kind of question which can be encountered is the measuring devices reliability. The reliability of the given questionaries is all about extend to which various kinds of the procedure is capable of returning an accurate kind of results despite the presence of a large number of factors (Robinson, 2014). A reliable question can be considered to be all about concerned all about returning all about accurate kind of results despite the presence of some kind of factors.

Data analysis: When a large volume of data is collected with the help of interviews or questionaries, the ultimate work comes into action. Proper analysis of quantitative data is considered to be a much easy factor and can be easily achieved with the help of descriptive and statistics. Data which is collected from interviews are considered to be very much difficult for analyzing various kinds of data(Luke et al., 2016). In various kinds of interviews are considered to be systematic in nature like in the case of structured interviews. It will provide many kinds of flexibility which are less sensitive to various kinds of individual data.

There are many kinds of interviews available at present markets like structure interviews, semi-structured interviews, unstructured interviews and lastly non-directive interview.

Structured Interviews:  A structured interview is sometimes also defined as a standardized interview. This type of interview mainly introduces some kind of rigidity for the given interview. Probing can be easily stated as a problem area which is used for a large number of structured interviews. The strength of structured interview is that various researchers can easily make a proper kind of control over the given topic and format for the given interview. It mainly takes because of detail interview guide which is required (Kallio et al., 2016). It comes up some of the common formats which are used for making it easier to for analyzing, guiding and comparing a list of codes. Apart from that, a detailed interview can be considered to be helpful for permitting inexperienced researchers for structure kind of data for an interview. Another strength of structured interview is that Prompting can be taken or included with various kinds of questions. Along with benefits structure interviews comes up with disadvantages like they do not adhere too much closely for any kind of interviews. It might not cause any kind of probing for relevant kind of information (Hartwig, Meissner & Semel, 2014). Along with it comes up with a set of interview guide in which respondent can easily hear and interpret or have proper kind of understanding regarding the question in different patterns. Researchers can easily make use of verbal comments and non-verbal comments which can easily have an influence on the respondent answer.

Semi-structured interviews: Semi-structured interviews can be stated as non-standardization and are mainly used in the frequent analysis. Researchers come up with a list of key themes, issues and question which needs to be covered properly (Kallio et al., 2014). In this kind of interview, the list of the order of question can be easily changed considering the direction of given interview. The order of question can be easily changed based on the direction in which the interview proceeds. Some additional question can be easily asked which may not have been anticipated at the beginning of the interview. This particular kind of interview provides a platform for researchers provides a large number of opportunities for having an idea regarding the view and opinions of interviews. Probing can be defined as a method which can be used for exploring a large number of paths which are not considered in the beginning phase. Various researchers can easily conduct interviews which are free for conducting a structured interview (Janghorban, Roudsari & Taghipour, 2014). In this interviewer does not need to have a proper idea regarding probe out for various opinions for the given interviewee. There is a large number of advantages of using semi-structured interviews in which various researchers can easily prompt and probe for deeper for the given situation. Let us consider an example in which interviewer can easily have an idea regarding making use of computers in English language techniques. Some of the responders are considered to be more literate than kind of others which are present in it. In this particular type of methodology, various interviewers can easily have an idea which makes to have the type of interviews which can be able to process or ask some kind of detail information. Apart from this researcher can easily provide an explanation regarding the rephrase of a large number of the question (Hewson & Stewart, 2016). There are some kinds of disadvantage like inexperienced interviewers cannot have some of the prompt questions. In some of the question, some relevant data may or not have been gathered. Apart from this, inexperienced interviewers might not come up with the ability to easily probe into the given information. Let us consider an example in which a respondent might not be able to make use computer. It also does not know how to make use of the system and also does not use them in any kind of language teaching. The interviewer needs to probe and look for a reason along with asking for proper kind of explanation.

Unstructured Interview:   This particular type of interview method is considered to be non-directive and flexible (Granhag et al., 2015). It can be also stated as more than casual instead of aforementioned form of interview. In this model there is no kind of requirement for following some of the detail form of interview. In this model each and every kind of interview is considered to be different. Interviews are mainly encouraged to easily speak up openly, frankly with as much as details which can be needed (Been?Dahmen et al., 2015). Generally, interviewers come up with virtual or kind of coaching training and various kinds of detail process and for that it is not prepared that much. Interviewers generally ask for question which the respondents can easily express their own experience, knowledge and along with their own opinions. It can easily create a large number of problems as interviewers might not be looking for the direction in which the given interview can take place. In many cases it is seen that researchers might not come up with any kind of data which is relevant to given case study or not. Interviewers needs to have proper kind of question which is needed to be carefully carried out and along with probing. The benefits of unstructured interviews are that it comes up with no kind of restriction and are generally placed on various kinds of question (Dikko, 2016). It is considered to knowledge which mainly exists about a proper kind of interview for the given topic or idea. So, after that background of the data can be collected easily and as per the given requirement. Unstructured interviews can be easily defined as a flexible and various researcher can have an idea regarding background data which is collected. Unstructured interviews can be considered to be inappropriate for large number inexperienced interviews. Various interviewers can easily bias and look for inappropriate questions. Apart from this respondent can easily talk about irrelevant and inconsequential kind of issue. Along with it can be easily used for coding and proper analysing of given data.

Non-directive interviews:  Structure and semi-structured interviews are mainly controlled by various kinds of researchers who have come up issues and questions. In case of non-directive interviews, there is no kind of issues are present in the given topic for pursing (Dongre & Sankaran, 2016). Interviews come to listen and do not make any kind of lead. Interviewer follows a list of the sequence which needs to be followed as per given thing. In most of the cases interviewee leads any kind of ongoing conversation. Interviewer comes up with objectives which are based on various kind of research in mind and various kinds of issues which can be easily encountered. Interviewed is mainly allowed to talk about various kinds of points which is all about freedom of the given subject. The ultimate job of interviewers to have an idea regarding the check and various kinds of unclear points and rephrasing of given question which is mainly used for analyzing the accuracy and proper kind of understanding (Deakin and Wakefield, 2014). Interviewers do not have any kind of idea regarding in which the given is likely to proceed. Non-directive interviews come from the very beginning of origin. It comes up various kinds of the object which can easily help various kinds of patients to properly reveal shapes about deep-seated and subconscious kinds of feelings. Non-directive kind of interviews comes up with some disadvantages like no direction or issues can be used for exploration which can easily result in problems and checking of given data.

Data collection comes up with three crucial aspects of the cost of collected data, the accuracy of collected data and lastly efficiency of collected data (Cridland et al., 2016). Despite the growth of online and mobile survey, face to face interview methods is still taken to be most popular kind of method for data collection. Face to face interview can be considered to be a most important method of data collection. A face to face interview mainly provides proper kind of benefits over the other kind of method of data collection.

Accurate screening: Face to face interviews mainly helps in more kind of accurate screening (Bryman & Bell, 2015). When an individual is being interviewed it claims to provide some kind of false information during screening questions like gender, age or race. It is also becoming possible for getting around various kinds of screening question like gender, age or even race. Apart from that, it is also possible for a various individual to get correct kind of demographic question so the proper kind of survey it did for gaining incentive.

Verbal and Non-verbal question: A face to face interview is considered to be no doubt useful for capturing verbal and non-verbal questions (Bryman, 2016). On the contrary, this particular method is used for capturing non-verbal cues which are inclusive of body language. It can easily show a proper level of enthusiasm for the list of the topic which is being in details. Proper capturing of non-verbal cues can come with any kinds of differences between a proper selection of an employee which is considered to be less skilled.

Face to face interviews comes with a large number of disadvantages similar to any kind of data collection method like:

Cost: Cost is mainly considered to be a major kind of disadvantage for various kinds of face to face interviews (Alshenqeeti, 2014). It mainly requires a proper kind of staff of people for conducting interviews at own personal cost. Personnel is mainly considered to be the highest value of cost in which a business can easily take place.

Quality of data by the interviewer: The type or quality of data which is received mainly depends on the various kinds of ability for the given interviewer (Cridland et al., 2015). Some kind of people comes up with the natural ability which is used for conducting the interview as well as conducting an interview and gathering information.

Manual entry of Data: If the given interview is conducted or administered on paper, then the data collected will be entered by manual mode only. Data scanning and proper scanning of question papers can be easily increased at the given cost of the project (Albuquerque et al., 2014). A staff for data personnel will need to be hired for increasing the cost of given project. 

Conclusion

From the above discussion, it can be easily concluded that this report is all about ethical interviewing techniques. The interview can be easily defined as a control conversation which is taken by interviewer which is obtained as required for data as required by the survey. It can easily provide respondent by proper kinds of means which can be used for asking a large number of questions. At the time of interview non-verbal kind of message is there and also needs to be interpreted in proper ways. Complex cognitive, attractive and social kind of feeling is mainly involved in a large number of interviews. Various kinds of ethical issues like confidentiality, access to information, reliability, and data analysis have been discussed in details. After various types of interview techniques that is structured interviews, semi-structured interviews, unstructured interviews, and the non-directive interview have been discussed in details. A list of benefits has been discussed in details like accurate screening, verbal and non-verbal mode of the interview has been discussed in detail. Along with the benefits, various kinds of drawbacks of face to face method of data collection that is cost, quality of data provided by interviewer has been discussed in details. Data is collected from a large number of interviewee about the given topic with the help of this process. The interview can be defined as a proper kind of method which is used for collection of data as well as gaining knowledge from a large number of individuals. Interviews can be defined as a proper kind of method in which various kinds of participants get involved and provide an idea regarding their view.

Reference 

Albuquerque, U. P., Ramos, M. A., de Lucena, R. F. P., & Alencar, N. L. (2014). Methods and techniques used to collect ethnobiological data. In Methods and techniques in Ethnobiology and Ethnoecology (pp. 15-37). Humana Press, New York, NY.

Alshenqeeti, H. (2014). Interviewing as a data collection method: A critical review. English Linguistics Research, 3(1), 39.

Been?Dahmen, J. M., Dwarswaard, J., Hazes, J. M., Staa, A., & Ista, E. (2015). Nurses’ views on patient self?management: a qualitative study. Journal of advanced nursing, 71(12), 2834-2845.

Bryman, A. (2016). Social research methods. Oxford university press.

Bryman, A., & Bell, E. (2015). Business research methods. Oxford University Press, USA.

Cridland, E. K., Jones, S. C., Caputi, P., & Magee, C. A. (2015). Qualitative research with families living with autism spectrum disorder: Recommendations for conducting semistructured interviews. Journal of Intellectual and Developmental Disability, 40(1), 78-91.

Cridland, E. K., Jones, S. C., Caputi, P., & Magee, C. A. (2016). Qualitative research with families living with autism spectrum disorder: Recommendations for conducting semistructured interviews. Journal of Intellectual and Developmental Disability, 40(1), 70-90.

Deakin, H. and Wakefield, K., 2014. Skype interviewing: Reflections of two PhD researchers. Qualitative research, 14(5), pp.603-616.

Dikko, M. (2016). Establishing construct validity and reliability: Pilot testing of a qualitative interview for research in Takaful (Islamic insurance). The Qualitative Report, 21(3), 521.

Dongre, A. R., & Sankaran, R. (2016). Ethical issues in qualitative research: Challenges and options. International Journal of Medical Science and Public Health, 5(6), 1187-1194.

Granhag, P. A., Oleszkiewicz, S., Strömwall, L. A., & Kleinman, S. M. (2015). Eliciting intelligence with the Scharff technique: Interviewing more and less cooperative and capable sources. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 21(1), 100.

Hartwig, M., Meissner, C. A., & Semel, M. D. (2014). Human intelligence interviewing and interrogation: Assessing the challenges of developing an ethical, evidence-based approach. In Investigative Interviewing (pp. 209-228). Springer, New York, NY.

Hewson, C., & Stewart, D. W. (2016). Internet research methods. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Janghorban, R., Roudsari, R. L., & Taghipour, A. (2014). Skype interviewing: The new generation of online synchronous interview in qualitative research. International journal of qualitative studies on health and well-being, 9(1), 24152.

Kallio, H., Pietilä, A. M., Johnson, M., & Kangasniemi, M. (2016). Systematic methodological review: developing a framework for a qualitative semi?structured interview guide. Journal of advanced nursing, 72(12), 2954-2965.

Kallio, H., Pietilä, A. M., Johnson, M., & Kangasniemi, M. (2014). Systematic methodological review: developing a framework for a qualitative semi?structured interview guide. Journal of advanced nursing, 72(12), 2954-2965.

Luke, T. J., Hartwig, M., Joseph, E., Brimbal, L., Chan, G., Dawson, E., … & Granhag, P. A. (2016). Training in the Strategic Use of Evidence technique: Improving deception detection accuracy of American law enforcement officers. Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology, 31(4), 270-278.

Robinson, O. C. (2014). Sampling in interview-based qualitative research: A theoretical and practical guide. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 11(1), 25-41.

Sooniste, T., Granhag, P. A., Strömwall, L. A., & Vrij, A. (2015). Statements about true and false intentions: Using the Cognitive Interview to magnify the differences. Scandinavian journal of psychology, 56(4), 371-378.

Vanderhallen, M., & Vervaeke, G. (2016). Between investigator and suspect: The role of the working alliance in investigative interviewing. In Investigative interviewing (pp. 63-90). Springer, New York, NY.

Vanderhallen, M., & Vervaeke, G. (2014). Between investigator and suspect: The role of the working alliance in investigative interviewing. In Investigative interviewing (pp. 63-90). Springer, New York, NY.

Ward, K., Gott, M., & Hoare, K. (2015). Participants’ views of telephone interviews within a grounded theory study. Journal of advanced nursing, 71(12), 2775-2785.

Woldie, H., Kebede, Y., & Tariku, A. (2015). Factors associated with anemia among children aged 6–23 months attending growth monitoring at Tsitsika Health Center, Wag-Himra Zone, Northeast Ethiopia. Journal of nutrition and metabolism, 2015.

Yu, H., Abdullah, A., & Saat, R. M. (2014). Overcoming time and ethical constraints in the qualitative data collection process: A case of information literacy research. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science, 46(3), 243-257`