Background information of NAB

Every company has its policies and values that are set to all the members which could come from the government or from the management of the institution. A governance and risk management audit is carried out in ensuring that an organization has clear and legal outline (Crowther, and Sefi 2010) and that the behaviors and expectations of the organization are in line with the recognized expectations worldwide without disregarding the social and cultural difference. To determine if an organization adheres to the set of values systems that it set, it examines the stakeholders and their effect in the overall function of the organization. This audit is important to any organization because from this study the predictions of the future performance of the organization can be known, the stakeholders can express their expectations from the organization and this could help the organization to learn the issues that face the managers and the employees and how to motivate and improve its performance meeting the expectations that the environment has about it (Mangala and Kumari 2015).

This paper provides an audit of a financial institution in Australia called National Australian Bank (NAB) in trying to provide a gap analysis which is the essence of government and risk management audit specifically in values and risk audit, it examines the relationship between the and commitment and performance of the value and risk management sector. It should be noted that his paper is not a social audit that specifies on the company and the environment relations only, this paper includes this section but its emphasis is on the values of the organization.

National Australian Bank is a financial institution located in Australia with its headquarters at Melbourne Australia. It was founded in the year 1982 and at that time it was referred to as National Commercial Banking Corporation of Australia Limited. It is a bank that has grown quite fast with branches in New Zealand and parts of Asia. This bank was among the top three best banks in the country with customers around 12.7 million globally, according to Forbes statistics it was position 100 in the globe with reference to its size.

The bank has a vision of being the best bank in Australia and New Zealand, to achieve this, they have set strategies in which they have categorized into three, one branch of strategy is concerned with the customers and the advocates, the other is concerned with the customers and the stakeholders while the last one is concerned with the shareholders.

Management and Board of Directors

This bank is headed by an able team of management led by the Andrew Thorburn the chief executive officer heading over 35, 000 employees, this public organization engages in activities that include commercial banking which entails taking deposits, provision of loans and other investment products, retail baking which entails offering of services to the public such things include savings credit and debit cards and mortgages, wholesale banking which entails which is just provision of large services to the public such as real estates  and other finance businesses ,wealth management which is an integration of planning in finance and financial services in coordination of activities such as estate planning and how to invest, lastly it provides services for insurance which is just a policy to deal with financial risks and losses it is also referred to as hedging in some scenarios (Hopwood, Leiner and Young 2012).

Above the management of is the board of directors that is responsible for: going through the management plans to ensure that they are risk free, provision of oversight of the risk management by the company, it oversees promotions and oversight of the organizations systems annually.

The purpose of the management is to ensure strategic and operational planning, the planning of succession and handing of organization power, risk management and compliance and lastly financial management and monitoring of the reporting system of the bank. 

Over the past five years there have been several changes within NAB, there has been an increase in the number of customer served from 8.3 million (2013) to 12.7 million (2017) with an increase in numbers of branches and the number of employees from approximately 1900(2014) to 3600 presently. It has had fluctuation of profits until 2015 in which the prices started to rise thereby reaching up to $5.29 billion in 2017.The dividend share has continued to be constant since 2016 but the cash earnings are continuously increasing estimated at 2.5% from 2014.It has expanded its branches from just Australia and New Zealand to UK and India while continuing to increase their services since they launched a direct branchless bank separate from UBank in 2008.It however has also maintained a spree of scandals throughout this years, in 2009 NAB was accused of lacking policies, in 2014 to 2015 there were scandals of fraud in NAB that begun in 2013.In 2017 the main scandal has been in its risk management policy.  

Financial Performance and Scandals

It has offered several services to the community as seen in its engagement with the schools and community originations in provision and management of financial services. The main way in which they advertise themselves to the shareholders as a public institution is provision of quality services (Atak, and Erturgut 2010) with the main of reaching maximum profits thus attracting the investors and shareholders they also occasionally carry out advertisement of the bank, the community services that they engage in also exposes them to shareholders impressed by their initiative in the society. National Australian Bank has greatly used the media both the social and television for its advertisement the recent one entitled “NAB Supporting Tomorrow’s game https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nZZzHl3AGXU.

NAB mainly promotes itself to the stakeholders by quality performance and they also have a code of conduct for the company to guarantee a good behavior so that the customers can have the best experience, it mostly uses the social media to interact with the stakeholders where they can give their comments and complains, the community activities that they carry out can also be a way of dealing with the stakeholders to meet their ever-changing expectations. There social media platforms are @NAB, @NAB Show and NAB (Facebook). Lastly in its advertisement NAB carries out widespread nation campaigns promoting their brands and those they are invested in as a way of reaching the stakeholders.

National Australian Bank just like any other organizations operates within some values that they aim to use in promoting their vison and mission (Scott 2015). These values might keep changing depending on the agency of the situation that is in question. These values are the foundation of the organization in which every employee must sign to abide to during their recruitment.

The values that the company follows is found din the National Australia Bank Code of Conduct:

Professionalism

The workers at the bank are to conduct themselves in a professional manner in their undertakings, this professionalism helps to foster trust and confidence of the stakeholders and the community in them. Some of the factors that they should observe under professionalism is treating others fellow employees with dignity adhering to the rules and regulations the behavior and outlining their role in the organization, professionalism also means accessing information only that one has clearance to access and that it should be work related if one is at work.

Professionalism also entails using the information system and computers or other telecommunication devices wisely, this device must never be used to distribute any illicit sexual information, a comment that is abusive or threatening to another person and lastly the comment should not show any form of ethnic or cultural discrimination.

Promotion to Shareholders and Stakeholders

According to NAB’s policy professionalism is also concerned with the use of social media in propagating the correct messages that do not interfere with the face of the organization, this includes using the social media lawfully, with transparency and in a manner showing respect to everyone that is online.

Honesty and integrity

Another major value of NA is honesty and integrity, honesty in this scenario entails carrying out businesses in a transparent manner that does not show any intent of malice or any other negative behavior

Honesty and integrity are grouped together and they entail an employee or any member should not be found stealing the property of the company, they should also not be found converting the company tools or equipment’s to their own interest without proper permission from the authority or the person in charge (Howlett, Ramesh and Perl 2009).

Honesty also entails that an employee should not misappropriate the tools or the equipment of the organization. Integrity should be observed in the dealings or the relationship of employees in the organization. It also entails complying with NAB Expense management policy. 

One must not hide the truth or try to protect a member of the organization who has gone against the laws and regulations that are stipulated in their conduct if there are the issues of suspecting that any of your colleagues might be engaging in this. Lastly NAB does not allow any form of retaliation or threats of retaliation in the company. They have a person who one reports to incase of any concern. This policy that is attached to honesty and integrity lease a question on whether the employees are not allowed to protest in times when they feel their rights are infringed.

Fairness

All the customers that are in the company whether new ones or existing ones are supposed to be treated fairly. Information must be provided in a manner that the customer will understand

Fairness also entails fair competition amongst the company and its competitors, the competition should be fair a legal.

Averting corruption

The company does not tolerate any corruption activity it the daily operation and this kind of operation could include thigs such as fraud or any form or racism or nepotism. The employees in the organization should not falsify information to obtain money, data or any property. Under corruption one is not allowed to engage in any form of bribery.

Values of National Australian Bank

Confidentiality

Every employer in the organization has access to information that maybe about the organization, the other workers, the suppliers, the management and other business affairs depending on their level of ranks (Simkin, Rose and Norman 2012) or priority in the organization this information according to the company policy should not be disclosed to anyone outside the company including the family member since it will be against the company policy

Personal information about another worker should also not be disclosed to any other person if not permitted by the organization. All this information is under the Private Act [1988] and it can only be stored, used, disclosed, updated or thrown away in accordance with this act (Ajmi, 2009).

Adherence to legal obligations, regulations and standards.

All organization especially banking institution have standards and accounting policy that I should use in its provision of report the company expects that all these policies are adhere to and that the employees are good citizens who follow the country laws.

The term value accounting is diverse in its scope since it not only touches in the book keeping area but it also encompasses the behavioral sector, it ca be contrast to creative accounting or any other accounting methods with any other ulterior motives that is not positive.

To deal with this, NAB has come up with various ways as discussed below:

Policy

The main method that NAB is using in ensuring that their values are adhered to strongly are use of policies, this policies control or limit the behavior of the members in the organization at almost every activity, these activities include:

Group human right policy

This is a policy that dictates how an employee should act in front of other fellow workers in terms of ensuring that he does not infringe any of their right in any form such as abuse or physical engagement. This prevents the employee from some ‘funny ’behaviors when they are together as a group example during work. 

One should be able to align their interest and the interest of the company to work for the good of the company, this policy provides the rules that should be adhered to in ensuring that the rules of the organization and those of the person do not conflict to cause errors.

Expense management policy

This is a policy that determines how the members of an organization should spent the money of the organization in the expenses this limits the employee from overspending or manipulating books of account for their own benefit.

Social Media guidelines and policy

This are policies or regulations that dictate how a member should use their own social media I terms of the breaches that they should not commit example sharing a material that could tarnish the image of the organization. This prevent the employee from sharing information that is unpleasing in the social media whether it of their accounts or it belongs to the organization an example would be if a person had conic with the manager he should not post it on the Facebook or twitter page.

Customer complains policy

This is a regulation that allows the customers to complain when an issue does not go on well, to the accountant sit provides a guideline on how to deal with the complains that are provided by the customer, this helps in making the dealing s with the customer to be fair. It therefore stops the accountants from handing he customers in a manner that is not ethical (Cohen, Krishnamoorthy, and Wright 2002).

Anti-fraud policy

This is a policy that stops the members of the organization from falsifying information with the purpose of gain whether personal or as a group. It sets out the responsibility to act transparency in their internal control.

Anti-bribery and corruption policy

This policy sets out the groups and individual approach toward respect to the anti-bribery laws to control the issues to do with corruption in the organization, this policy stops a person from carrying out any form of corruption in the interest of personal gains.

Serious misconduct policy.

This policy is diverse in that it prohibits the employees from engaging in an extreme act whether to the other fellow employee or to the shareholders or to the stakeholders. An example is it would stop on employee from fighting with another employee during working hours.

Anti-money laundering and counter terrorist financing policy

This policy limits the stakeholders in an organization from engaging or colluding with someone from the outside of the organization in perfuming money laundering activities an example would be limiting the planning of money heist.

Employee conduct management policy

This is the last standard that contain all this measures from, it contains how the employee should behave within and outside the organization in a comprehensive way.

Privacy and data protection policy

Tis regulation provides security for each member in the organization on sharing of confidential information so that one cannot just share the private information of another person. 

Other policies that supplement this regulation that controls or dictate the ethical behavior of members in an organization are mainly the countries policy such as The Private Act [1998] and other Australian professional standards.

Benefits has been used to regulate the ethical behavior of employees right from the book of accounts to the behaviors (John, Litov and Yeung 2008) this is because of the attachment of remuneration benefits to ethics, this then makes the employees to strive hard in ensuring that they have good ethics so that they can earn high remunerations.

As seen in the above examples National Australian Bank (NAB) is committed to ensuring that the value system that it has established in the organization is met in accordance with the policies they have established (Lin and Hwang 2010), but, the question that an auditor asks is the extent of implementation of this commitment and if there is a gap between their commitment and their delivery of the commitment.

Understanding how important this was I tried to book for an appointment with one of the cashiers of the organization to no avail, my emails were replied after a long time only to be informed that there was no time since she was busy, I therefore did several personal researches in trying to find out on this gap, I believe her behavior could also have been increased by the fact that she didn’t want to disclose any information that could breach confidentiality as their policy

Some of the gaps that I identified were on:

Honesty

One of the banks major values is honesty yet there has been a problem in this sector, according to an internal audit carried out in April 2015 which was obtained by “The Australian Financial Review” the company has problems with its risk management system. Adele Ferguson refers to the risk management policy Of National Australian Bank as “ineffective and inconsistent” (Aebi, Sabato and Schmid 2012).

NAB is a major banking institution and its rating in the risk management is expected to be high (Andres and Vallelado 2008) but this was not the case since it had received a three-star, elite internal audit team referred to this rating as “the worst rating possible”. Over the years NAB has failed to come out and explain this issue to the public indicating this problem thus going against their own value of honesty.

Integrity

Another gap that I could identify is in line with integrity, this company advocates for integrity in the preparation of financial statement and the behavior of the company. David Fisher the CEO of The Web Lender defines integrity as doing the correct activities with or without the presence of anyone basing them on beliefs, values and morals of the organization.

In May 3,2018 NAB sold its MLC wealth management in trying to get away from a scandal that has been in the headlines for quite a long time, this news was reported in ABC. https://www.abc.net.au/news/2018-05-03/nab-offloading-mlc-$2.5b-half-year-profit/9720782 this scandal is attributed to the fact that during the process of wealth distribution there was a risk where they had forged some signatures of the clients which is a breach of integrity as a value in the organization.

Another issue in the organization that shows a gap in the professionalism of the company is seen when the British regulator closed a branch of NAB Clydesdale Bank for lying to the Financial Ombudsman service after they had falsified records which can be classified also under fraud by the organization indicating how they breached their own policy on professionalism that advocates for honesty and use of the correct standards (Van and Bratanovic 2009).

Conclusion

Every organization has got their own values and standards though there are some shared professional and ethical standards, most companies have been able to meet this value while others are struggling to meet this value probably due to inefficient ways that are established in reaching this quality (Bhimani 2009). This prompts for an audit to enable the organization recognizes some of this issue related to the ethics and behavior in the organization before they result to scandals.

In the case of National Australia Bank there are adequate policies and regulations that dictate almost every aspect of their functioning, this has been significant but it can also be seen that they have problems in meeting their own values, this could be attributed to by the management since NAB is a large company that has a lot of branches. In general, an audit is necessary and beneficial for accompany that want to achieve its goals (Walker 2009). 

References

Aebi, V., Sabato, G. and Schmid, M., 2012. Risk management, corporate governance, and bank performance in the financial crisis. Journal of Banking & Finance, 36(12), pp.3213-3226.

Al-Ajmi, J., 2009. Audit firm, corporate governance, and audit quality: Evidence from Bahrain. Advances in accounting, 25(1), pp.64-74.

Atak, M. and Erturgut, R., 2010. An empirical analysis on the relation between learning organization and organizational commitment. Procedia-social and behavioral sciences, 2(2), pp.3472-3476.

Bhimani, A., 2009. Risk management, corporate governance and management accounting: Emerging interdependencies.

Bodnar, G.H. and Hopwood, W.S., 2012. Accounting information systems. Upper Saddle River: Pearson.

Bridgman, P., & Davis, G. (2004). The Australian policy handbook. Allen & Unwin.

Cohen, J., Krishnamoorthy, G. and Wright, A.M., 2002. Corporate governance and the audit process. Contemporary accounting research, 19(4), pp.573-594.

Crowther, D. and Sefi, S., 2010. Corporate governance and risk management. Bookboon.

De Andres, P. and Vallelado, E., 2008. Corporate governance in banking: The role of the board of directors. Journal of banking & finance, 32(12), pp.2570-2580.

Florey, K., 2012. State Law, US Power, Foreign Disputes: Understanding the Extraterritorial Effects of State Law in the Wake of Morrison v. National Australia Bank. BuL Rev., 92, p.535.

Grindle, M.S., 2017. Politics and policy implementation in the Third World. Princeton University Press.

Hopwood, W.S., Leiner, J.J. and Young, D.G.R., 2012. Forensic accounting and fraud examination. McGraw-Hill.

Howlett, M., Ramesh, M. and Perl, A., 2009. Studying public policy: Policy cycles and policy subsystems (Vol. 3). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

John, K., Litov, L. and Yeung, B., 2008. Corporate governance and risk?taking. The Journal of Finance, 63(4), pp.1679-1728.

Lin, J.W. and Hwang, M.I., 2010. Audit quality, corporate governance, and earnings management: A meta?analysis. International Journal of Auditing, 14(1), pp.57-77.

Mangala, D. and Kumari, P., 2015. Corporate fraud prevention and detection: Revisiting the literature.

Painter, R., Dunham, D. and Quackenbos, E., 2011. When Courts and Congress Don’t Say What They Mean: Initial Reactions to Morrison v. National Australia Bank and to the Extraterritorial Jurisdiction Provisions of the Dodd-Frank Act. Minn. J. Int’l L., 20, p.1.

Paudel, N.R., 2009. A critical account of policy implementation theories: status and reconsideration. Nepalese Journal of Public Policy and Governance, 25(2), pp.36-54.

Scott, W.R., 2015. Financial accounting theory (Vol. 2, No. 0, p. 0). Prentice Hall.

Siddique, S., Sciulli, N. and Faux, J., 2011. Towards a theoretical model for analysing the quality of corporate environmental disclosure: emphasizing what and why. International Review of Business Research Papers, 7(3), pp.194-206.

Simkin, M.G., Rose, J.M. and Norman, C.S., 2012. Core concepts of accounting information systems. John Wiley & Son Inc., Franklin Township, New Jersey, USA, ISBN, 97811, p.18022306.

Van Greuning, H. and Brajovic-Bratanovic, S., 2009. Analyzing banking risk: a framework for assessing corporate governance and risk management. World Bank Publications.

Vitale, M., 2001. National Australia Bank.

Walker, D., 2009. A review of corporate governance in UK banks and other financial industry entities.