Project Scope

ABC is toy manufacturing company based on Ontario and currently want to introduce a new product by Christmas. The idea is to build a new toy based on a popular cartoon character within two month. However, the project manager of ABC, Roger is not sure that the product can be developed within the time period and want to make some adjustment over the marketing section. He want to reduction the product advertisement and proposed the idea to the marketing manager Jane Davis. Jane thinks such product needs minimum six weeks of advertisement in order to capture the attention due to volatility of the market. In order solve the problem, Roger discussed the issue with the product manager George. George offered to speed up the tool build by working weekends. Working one weekend (Saturday and Sunday) is equivalent to doing one week of regular work but at the additional charges.

The project scope is to develop a flexible schedule for introduce the new product with in 31 August 2018. As the project need to be completed within short amount of time, the schedule will highly effect the budget and other resources. The objectives of the project is to propose suitable schedule with budget allocation and also showcase the impact of the crash on the budget.

Task Name	Duration
Introduction of New Toy Save Time On Research and Writing Hire a Pro to Write You a 100% Plagiarism-Free Paper. Get My Paper	150 days
Obtain Funding	1 week
Finalize Engineering	2 weeks
Deliver New Equipment	8 weeks
Build Tools/ Dies	11 weeks
Install equipment	1 week
Train workers	1 week
Debug process	1 week
Establish Debugging plan	2 weeks
Finalize packaging and art work	3 weeks
Advertise	10 weeks
Raw material delivery	12 weeks
Initial production run	3 weeks
Ship product	1 week

                                   

Task Name	Baseline Start	Baseline Finish
Introduction of New Toy	Fri 20-04-18	Thu 15-11-18
Obtain Funding	Fri 20-04-18	Thu 26-04-18
Finalize Engineering	Fri 27-04-18	Thu 10-05-18
Deliver New Equipment	Fri 27-04-18	Thu 21-06-18
Build Tools/ Dies	Fri 11-05-18	Thu 26-07-18
Install equipment	Fri 22-06-18	Thu 28-06-18
Train workers	Fri 27-07-18	Thu 02-08-18
Debug process	Fri 03-08-18	Thu 09-08-18
Establish Debugging plan	Fri 27-04-18	Thu 10-05-18
Finalize packaging and art work	Fri 11-05-18	Thu 31-05-18
Advertise	Fri 11-05-18	Thu 19-07-18
Raw material delivery	Fri 27-07-18	Thu 18-10-18
Initial production run	Fri 19-10-18	Thu 08-11-18
Ship product	Fri 09-11-18	Thu 15-11-18

The schedules are constructed by following the base duration of the project which exceeds the expected delivery time. In order to complete the project within august several assumption has been made as the duration of the advertise and tools manufacture has been decreased to a certain level while increasing the resources.

Task Name	Start	Finish
Introduction of New Toy	Fri 20-04-18	Thu 13-09-18
Obtain Funding	Fri 20-04-18	Thu 26-04-18
Finalize Engineering	Fri 27-04-18	Thu 10-05-18
Deliver New Equipment	Fri 27-04-18	Thu 21-06-18
Build Tools/ Dies	Fri 11-05-18	Thu 26-07-18
Install equipment	Fri 22-06-18	Thu 28-06-18
Train workers	Fri 27-07-18	Thu 02-08-18
Debug process	Fri 03-08-18	Thu 09-08-18
Establish Debugging plan	Fri 27-04-18	Thu 10-05-18
Finalize packaging and art work	Fri 11-05-18	Thu 31-05-18
Advertise	Fri 11-05-18	Thu 21-06-18
Raw material delivery	Fri 27-07-18	Thu 16-08-18
Initial production run	Fri 17-08-18	Thu 06-09-18
Ship product	Fri 07-09-18	Thu 13-09-18

                             

                         

The critical path can be explained as the sequence of stages determining the minimum time needed for an operation, especially when analysed a project. The project above pictures shows the critical paths which are denoted in red along with resource allocation.

                                           

Cost estimation for the baseline was estimated around 39,000. For minimizing extra cost implies as 100 per week. The final result showcase that the cost variance is almost 3,720 dollar.

Task Name	Baseline
Introduction of New Toy	$39,650.00
Obtain Funding	$1,600.00
Finalize Engineering	$3,200.00
Deliver New Equipment	$0.00
Build Tools/ Dies	$19,650.00
Install equipment	$0.00
Train workers	$1,600.00
Debug process	$1,600.00
Establish Debugging plan	$0.00
Finalize packaging and art work	$0.00
Advertise	$12,000.00
Raw material delivery	$0.00
Initial production run	$0.00
Ship product	$0.00

Task Name	Total Cost
Introduction of New Toy	$43,370.00
Obtain Funding	$1,600.00
Finalize Engineering	$3,200.00
Deliver New Equipment	$0.00
Build Tools/ Dies	$22,850.00
Install equipment	$1,260.00
Train workers	$1,600.00
Debug process	$1,600.00
Establish Debugging plan	$0.00
Finalize packaging and art work	$1,060.00
Advertise	$7,000.00
Raw material delivery	$1,600.00
Initial production run	$0.00
Ship product	$1,600.00

Task Name	Total Cost	Baseline	Variance
Introduction of New Toy	$43,370.00	$39,650.00	$3,720.00
Obtain Funding	$1,600.00	$1,600.00	$0.00
Finalize Engineering	$3,200.00	$3,200.00	$0.00
Deliver New Equipment	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00
Build Tools/ Dies	$22,850.00	$19,650.00	$3,200.00
Install equipment	$1,260.00	$0.00	$1,260.00
Train workers	$1,600.00	$1,600.00	$0.00
Debug process	$1,600.00	$1,600.00	$0.00
Establish Debugging plan	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00
Finalize packaging and art work	$1,060.00	$0.00	$1,060.00
Advertise	$7,000.00	$12,000.00	-$5,000.00
Raw material delivery	$1,600.00	$0.00	$1,600.00
Initial production run	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00
Ship product	$1,600.00	$0.00	$1,600.00

Conclusion

ABC is toy manufacturing company based on Ontario and currently want to introduce a new product by Christmas. The idea is to build a new toy based on a popular cartoon character within two month. ABC needs to consider the consequences of the early delivery and restores allocation. The amount of duration needs for each task has been reduced to a certain limit which increases the resources cost 1000 dollar per week. The above tables describes the impact of the duration change in a project. ABC needs to be focused on their resource management crucially as the project can go over budget. The objectives of the project is achieved where suitable schedule with budget allocation charts are proposed and also showcase the impact of the crash on the budget.

Heravi, A., Coffey, V., & Trigunarsyah, B. (2015). Evaluating the level of stakeholder involvement during the project planning processes of building projects. International Journal of Project Management, 33(5), 985-997.

Kang, P. S., Aboutaleb, A., Duffy, A., Embley, T., Glenn, J., & Adams, C. (2015, October). Discrete Event Simulation to Reduce the Effect of Uncertainties on Project Planning. In 29th European Simulation and Modelling Conference, Leicester, UK (pp. 26-28).

Kerzner, H., & Kerzner, H. R. (2017). Project management: a systems approach to planning, scheduling, and controlling. John Wiley & Sons.

Papke-Shields, K. E., & Boyer-Wright, K. M. (2017). Strategic planning characteristics applied to project management. International Journal of Project Management, 35(2), 169-179.

Rieger, J. P., Stanley, J., & Traynor, R. (2014). Project planning and management for ecological restoration (pp. 7-11). Washington, DC: Island Press.

Šetinc, M., Gradišar, M., & Tomat, L. (2015). Optimization of a highway project planning using a modified genetic algorithm. Optimization, 64(3), 687-707.

Son, H., & Kim, C. (2015). Early prediction of the performance of green building projects using pre-project planning variables: data mining approaches. Journal of Cleaner Production, 109, 144-151.