Introduction and Brief History of a Company

The United Parcel Service of America is the global leader in package delivery market. Apart from these services, the company is also a leader in transportation and logistics services in the market. The founder of the company, James Casey, named the company as the American Messenger Organization, in Seattle. The company delivers about eight million shipping consumers in two hundred countries, with approximately four billion packages deliver in the globe in 2009 alone ( (Ziegler, 2014). The company is has gained a competitive advantage, despite having rivals like the FedEx and USPS.

The company has a strategized mission to be a global leader in the package delivering services and offering of specialized logistics and transportation services. UPS enhances its developments in the frontier of its logistics, e-commerce and management of its supply chain, which enable the combination of information, funds and flow of products (Baker, Dudley, Holt, Stockton, & Vukota, 2011). The vision and mission of the company implies that UPS has strategized to becoming an expert in various operation areas in the delivery of packages in the globe.

The UPS applies the Alderfer motivation model. This model can be classified into relatedness satisfactory needs, existing necessities and development potentials (Titrek, Polatcan, Zafer Gunes, & Sezen, 2014) . The theory is applicable in the company and grouped into the three fundamental tiers, however, the application is somewhat rational and focusses on crucial existence of individuals in the company.

The company embraced a motivational approach of teamwork. Teamwork enhances workers’ degree of satisfaction in the job (Sagaut, Deck, & Terracol, 2013). This approach makes the employees to feel motivated to work and support the company towards achieving its organizational goals. The UPS has creating teams in the workforce to assist its workers to relate with each other effectively (Sheward & Branch, 2012). This strategic approach helps to management to share common organizational goals, which enhancement the process of decision-making.

The UPS applied a time-shifting technique in its primary ambient extractions to raise the company level of performance considering fundamental principle in package delivery. The technique involves inputting signals that conform to the standardized inter-chain timeframe difference.

Figure 1: Team’s Development Stages

                        

The five fundamental stages of teamwork development are Adjourning, Performing, Norming, Storming and Forming (Medinilla, 2012). In the first stage, the management of the company calls for employees and evaluated the company opportunities and threats. This stage allows the management to outline specific organizational goals and objectives that will enable them to stay on top of the competition. The second stage of storming is crucial since it enables the team to sort out its strategic measures by allowing organizational participation. This stage allows the company to collect views from its workers and listen to some conflicts during the assigning of roles. The norming stage involves resolution of problems to enhancing intimacy and corporation in the workforce. Afterward, the organization can then proceed to the performing stage that allows workers to concentrate on particular goals and objectives to reaching a desired optimal success and task completion in the adjourning stage.

Vision, Mission, and Values of the Organization

Organizational group members are expected to undertake different roles to enable the company ton run smoothly (Rogelberg, 2007). The UPS has a comprehensive listing of organizational group member roles that fall under work roles. These roles are majorly task-oriented that allows the company to accomplish group goals and tasks. The company human resource sector is strategized in manner that enables workers to accomplish specific tasks, enable the evaluation of completed tasks, assigning of daily jobs and classification of group members roles.

Group norms in a company established standardized guidelines and rules that define the accepted code of conducts in the workforce (Somech & Drach, 2004). In the UPS, this pattern of behavior includes employees’ punctuality in task completion. Supervisors assign specific tasks that have to be completed in time.

• Michael McLary: V.P, strategy
• Teresa Finley: Chief Business officer
• David Abney: CEO
• Peter Harry: Director
• Myron Peretz: Organizational President
• Myron Grey: Financial Officer

Without teamwork, specific tasks may wear workers emotionally, physically and mentally (Streeck, Goodwin, & LeBaron, 2013). Perceptibly, when the UPS management does not embrace the model of teamwork, these effects might be evident. The framework to workers’ motivation enhances productivity and increase of production bottom-line.

To attain groupthink and social loafing, the company has a reward and recognition system put in place to reinforce their workers positively. UPS embraces get creativity by offering performance gifts, bonus cards, and extension of lunch breaks or vacations to best performing employees.

There has been an existing conflict concerning the arranged utilization of the land, however. The town will pitch the land to UPS organization however feels that townhomes would be awful for the general network. The company is worried about the extra expense and weight of children that the townhomes would bring into the network. The UPS comprehends about the worry of the community and demands for a considerate circumstance to prevail (Ohemeng & McCall, 2013)

The form of conflicts in the company is Intragroup and is a type of clash that happens between the employees in the workforce (Pittinsky, 2005). Parties that have contrasting assumptions and qualities are often prompted to such conflicts.

Management of conflicts happens in any exchange or choice from which a partnered individual may benefit or get a fiscal or money related advantage. Self-managing incorporates, yet is not restricted to, business and budgetary exchanges between the UPS and a partnered individual, which are explicitly precluded by the Internal Revenue Code and by relevant arrangements of state law.

The organization likewise applies distributive negotiation in transactions and additionally in some cases called positional or hard-haggling arrangement and endeavors to disperse a “settled pie” of advantages.

Bases of Power Used In the Organization

The organization uses legitimate bases of power rests in the conviction among workers whereby their administrator has the privilege to give orders dependent on his or her position. For instance, at the scene of a wrongdoing, individuals as a rule follow the requests of a formally dressed cop dependent on their common conviction that he or she has the foreordained specialist to give such requests.

UPS utilizes consistency or duty as an affecting strategy – The first of the influencing tactics shows that the organization ordinarily pursues consistency, so in the event that somebody submits on a little dimension to something, they are bound to be steady and keep focusing on it later (Geertshuis, Cooper-Thomas, & Price, 2013). A model in the business world is to ‘attempt before you purchase’. The odds of buying after this are more noteworthy than obtaining ‘cool’.

The most critical destination for UPS representatives is home, so the company keeps centered driving in charge of its 200 or more wellbeing projects and bits of preparing, which are ordinarily educated by guaranteed supervisors. In addition, proficient advancement is energized on all dimensions, from educational cost help for low maintenance representatives to remarkable administration improvement programs that challenge UPS best administrators to investigate their general surroundings. Thusly, they bring key skills like basic leadership, critical thinking, and association to the workforce.

Motivation of the Employees in the Organization

Political activities and strategies in the UPS are controlled by the streams and ebbs based on the given turns, the given key period, by the connection of the battling powers, by the types of the battle (development), by the rhythm of the development, by the field of the battle at each given minute, in each given area (Doherty & Hayes, 2011). What’s more, since these variables change in similarity with the states of place and time amid the period starting with one turn then onto the next, strategies, which don’t cover the entire war.

The UPS alludes to a company’s framework that incorporates IT methods of decision-making during administration and accountability of staff members. In the company, administration methods work according to the organizational mission and vision from the managing staff to the subordinate. The company embraces basic leadership and follow-ship styles that incorporate IT use.

Organization Leader’s Traits

The company leadership traits include trust, ability to motivate and encourage employees. All solid and productive connections in life require trust in its core (Yang, 2017). On the off chance that the company does not confine in its employees, accomplice, supervisor or association to do what its say they will do or act with straightforwardness and uprightness, it is difficult to appreciate the full advantage of the company’s teamwork framework.

The company also embraces the spirit of participation and empowerment of employees by offering specific training programs certified by the managers.

With leaders using transactional style of leadership, UPS is concerned with enhancing its competitive flow of its daily operations.

Levels of Organizational Culture

A solid corporate culture is a standout amongst the most essential resources of any organization (Gabriel, 2015). In any case, the UPS additionally risk restricting development, decent variety of thought and development on the off chance that they enable culture to drive an excessive number of choices.

Figure 2: Levels of Organizational Culture

                                    

The organization has an exceptional corporate culture that is a standout amongst the most critical resources of any organization. Nevertheless, organizations additionally risk restricting development, assorted variety of thought and development on the off chance that they enable culture to drive such a large number of choices. Myron Gray, leader of U.S. tasks for UPS, talked about the job of initiative in building up the sensitive harmony between culture and development at the Rotary Club of Seattle.

The organizations are much the same as people groups they all have one of a kind and particular identities perceive as an authoritative culture (Malin & Hackmann, 2016). Mentoring and socialization in UPS underpins newcomers’ investigation on how to legitimately function into another organization; this technique enables people to comprehend proper learning, practices, and states of mind associated with a specific job in an organization.

The company has various departments as indicated in the figure below:

The contemporary UPS Store structure is frequently a moderately little retail setting, freely claimed by franchisees. It essentially serves retail clients, independent ventures for their little bundle conveyance necessities that include packaging and delivery services offered to consumers.

Groups and Teams in the Organization

UPS embraces a mechanistic organization. The structure can give advanced gear, for example, computerized photograph booths, laser printers or work areas with a picture scanner and Adobe plan programming.

In their history of change, UPS likewise rebuilt their association from a useful based structure to one that is focused on the procedure. They currently have associations that emphasis on the client data the board procedure, the item the executive’s procedure, the client relationship-the board procedure, the business data and investigation process, and the bundle the executives’ procedure (Eriksson-Zetterquist & Renemark, 2016).

As UPS continues to grow, it continues to launch measures on how to overcome the competition by evaluating change management techniques. Change management is incorporated naturally in the company since the company has to stay on top of the competition. To overcome resistance to change in the company, workers are showcased of the significance the change could bring to the company.

UPS use the method of tracking relevant stressors to handle organizational stress. The management identifies all the situations that could lead to stressful workplace environments. Moreover, the company records employees’ thoughts, information and feeling concerning the workplace.

The new monetary condition has achieved significant changes in the lives of American natives, yet customer conduct in these business sectors has generally stayed unexplored or has not gotten due consideration by specialists. Investigation of the monetary type of buyer ethnocentrism is by all accounts applicable to the investigation of purchaser conduct in the bundling conveyance showcase now (Ernst, Hoyer, & Rübsaamen, 2010)

The organization’s structure on globalization and improvement keeps on executing the standards of market-situated economy, political vote based system, advertisers, and speculators have an expanding requirement for understanding personal conduct standards, qualities, and states of mind of bundling conveyance customers with the end goal to create powerful promoting techniques in these developing markets.

In spite of the overall freshness of Western items available, UPS manages diversity through R&D of purchasers’ interest with these may be eclipsed by a worry for individual and financial prosperity.

The company has a change to globalize to Central Europe and Asia since the company has set standards on how to research potential market economies, advertisers and all the relevant speculators. The company has an expanding requirement for understanding personal conduct standards, qualities, and states of mind of bundling conveyance customers with the end goal to create powerful promoting techniques in these developing markets.

Conclusion

The UPS has managed to establish a competitive advantage in America after being a global leader in packaging and delivery service that offers premium host-related services. The management of the company embraces strategic measures of team development, which follow the Tuckman’s model. This model also incorporates the technique of mentoring and socialization in to allow newcomers to know how the company operates. This technique enables employees to comprehend proper learning, practices, and states of mind associated with a specific job in an organization.

Baker, R., Dudley, B., Holt, S., Stockton, C., & Vukota, V. (2011). United Parcel Services IT Infrastructure: A Case Analysis. Review Of Business Information Systems (RBIS), 12(3), 1-19. doi:10.19030/rbis.v12i3.4351

Doherty, B., & Hayes, G. (2011). DoheTactics, traditions and opportunities: British and French crop-trashing actions in comparative perspective. European Journal Of Political Research, 540-562. doi:10.1111/j.1475-6765.2011.02048.x

Eriksson-Zetterquist, U., & Renemark, D. (2016). Can Changes to Gender Equality Be Sustained? Gender, Work & Organization, 23(4), 363-378. doi:10.1111/gwao.12127

Ernst, H., Hoyer, W., & Rübsaamen, C. (2010). Sales, Marketing, and Research-and-Development Cooperation Across New Product Development Stages: Implications for Success. Journal Of Marketing, 74(5), 80-92. doi:10.1509/jmkg.74.5.80

Gabriel, K. (2015). Organizational Development, Organizational Culture and Organizational Change. SSRN Electronic Journal,, 1(3), 10-19. doi:10.2139/ssrn.2686104

Geertshuis, S., Cooper-Thomas, H., & Price, M. (2013). Appraisals of self and situation as determinants of upward influencing tactics. Journal Of Applied Social Psychology, 43(8), 1563-1577. doi:10.1111/jasp.12106

Malin, J., & Hackmann, D. (2016). Mentoring as Socialization for the Educational Leadership Professoriate: A Collaborative Autoethnography. Mentoring & Tutoring: Partnership In Learning, 24(2), 158-178. doi:1080/13611267.2016.1170561

Medinilla, A. (2012). Agile Management. Heidelberg: Springer.

Ohemeng, F., & McCall, E. (2013). Performance management and “undesirable” organizational behaviour: Standardized testing in Ontario schools. Canadian Public Administration, 56(3), 456-477. doi:10.1111/capa.12030

Pittinsky, T. (2005). Allophilia and intergroup leadership. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University, John F. Kennedy School of Government.

Rogelberg, S. (2007). Encyclopedia of industrial and organizational psychology. Thousand Oaks, Calif: SAGE.

Sagaut, P., Deck, S., & Terracol, M. (2013). Multiscale and multiresolution approaches in turbulence. London: Imperial College Press.

Sheward, S., & Branch, R. (2012). Motivational career counselling and coaching. Los Angeles: SAGE.

Somech, A., & Drach, A. (2004). Exploring organizational citizenship behaviour from an organizational perspective: The relationship between organizational learning and organizational citizenship behaviour. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 77(3), 281-298. doi:10.1348/0963179041752709

Streeck, J., Goodwin, C., & LeBaron, C. (2013). Embodied interaction. New York: Cambridge Univ. Press.

Titrek, O., Polatcan, M., Zafer Gunes, D., & Sezen, G. (2014). The relationship among emotional intelligence (EQ), organizational justice (OJ), organizational citizenship behaviour (OCB). International Journal Of Academic Research, 6(1), 213-220. doi:10.7813/2075-4124.2014/6-1/b.30

Yang, J. (2017). Leveraging leader–leader exchange to enrich the effect of leader–member exchange on team innovation. Journal Of Management & Organization, 1(2), 1-16. doi:10.1017/jmo.2017.54

Ziegler, M. (2014). Choice at Work: Young v. United States Parcel Service, Pregnancy Discrimination, and Reproductive Liberty. SSRN Electronic Journal, 2(4), 40-49. doi:10.2139/ssrn.2524142