Audit Report Preparation: Materiality And Analytical Review

Discussion and Analysis

In the given case, an audit is to be conducted for one of the small client named Chartreuse Enterprises and hence the audit partner of the company has requested the audit assistant to prepare an audit plan for the same based on the trial balance of the client given below. The Trail balance is to be studied and the significant audit accounts which need immediate attention and checking needs to be highlighted. In the report below, the materiality to be taken for the audit of the client has been revisited and calculated (Goldmann, 2016). The preliminary analytical review of the company has been done and trend analysis has been done to find out the risk of material misstatement and a brief justification has been provided as to why these accounts are eligible for audit testing. The audit procedure that would be required in each of the above cases to find out audit evidences has also been mentioned. Finally, the fraud risk analysis of the client has been done based on the analytical review.

Save Time On Research and Writing
Hire a Pro to Write You a 100% Plagiarism-Free Paper.
Get My Paper

The trail balance of the client, Chartreuse Enterprises has been shown below:

Chartreuse Enterprises

Trial Balance

Particulars

Save Time On Research and Writing
Hire a Pro to Write You a 100% Plagiarism-Free Paper.
Get My Paper

Jul 1, 2016 – Apr 30, 2017

Jul 1, 2015 – June 30, 2016

Debit

Credit

Debit

Credit

Cash at Bank

         85,000

             80,000

Accounts receivable

       118,340

          111,000

Inventory

       187,500

          174,000

Machinery

         71,000

             65,000

Accumulated Depreciation

      30,959

      24,375

Motor Vehicles

         66,000

             66,000

Accumulated Depreciation

      27,308

      21,000

Furniture

            7,400

               7,400

Accumulated Depreciation

         2,820

        2,220

Bank Loan

    230,000

   230,000

Sales

    157,500

   187,450

Cost of sales

         57,917

             63,595

Consultancy fees

      49,375

      57,000

Interest income

               40

              50

Bank charges

               290

                   350

Depreciation

         13,492

             15,863

Interest expense

            9,583

             11,500

Printing

               210

                   250

Repairs and Maintenance

            1,200

               5,050

Wages

         40,000

             53,000

Superannuation

            2,967

               4,770

Total

       660,898

    498,002

          657,778

   522,095

Materiality is something, which is very important and critical from the auditor’s perspective. Some information, misstatement, error or omission is said to be material in individual or in aggregation if the same has the capability or the ability to change the economic decision of the user(Belton, 2017). It serves a very important purpose in the audit as it helps in classifying what is material and what is not, thereby helping the auditor in focusing in critical and significant areas only. In the case of the given company, the preliminary materiality level has been set at $15000, which is very high considering the financials of the company (Islam & Islam, 2011). The IASB as well as the accounting board and firms have prescribed and set many norms for the determination of the materiality limits, which has been explained below with the example. The materiality limits can be in the range of 0.5-1% of gross revenue, 1-2% of the total assets or the gross profit, 5-10% of the net profit, 2-5% of the shareholder’s return, etc. The materiality level as per the below working should be in the range of $787.5 to $157 as if any other limit is being chosen, lot of material accounts would be missed out in the process and from the ambit of the audit (Werner, 2017). Considering the given materiality limit, the accounts, which would not be ignored, is the interest expenses, superannuation account, repairs and maintenance, depreciation, etc.

(in $)

Chartreuse Enterprises

Quantitative estimate of materiality

Criterion

Base

Amount

Materiality level/range

0.5% to 1% of gross revenue

Gross Revenue

157,500.00

787.5 to 1575

1% to 2% of the total assets

Total Assets

474,152.93

4741.53 to 9483.06

1% to 2% of the gross profit

Gross Profit

59,583.33

595.83 to 1191.67

2% – 5% of the shareholders’ equity

Equity

NA

NA

5% to 10% of the net profit

Net profit

81,256.67

406.28 to 812.57

Materiality

The analytical review has been done in the form of the trend analysis and the preparation of the common size balance sheet for the years 2017 and 2016. Each of the line items of the profit and loss account has been represented as a percentage of the sales(Trieu, 2017).

Chartreuse Enterprises

Income Statement

Particulars

         2,017

 % of sales

         2,016

 % of sales

Sales

    157,500

76.1%

    187,450

76.7%

Consultancy fees

      49,375

23.9%

      57,000

23.3%

Interest income

               40

0.0%

               50

0.0%

Total Revenue

    206,915

100.0%

    244,500

100.0%

Less: Expenses

Cost of sales

      57,917

28.0%

      63,595

26.0%

Bank charges

            290

0.1%

            350

0.1%

Depreciation

      13,492

6.5%

      15,863

6.5%

Interest expense

         9,583

4.6%

      11,500

4.7%

Printing

            210

0.1%

            250

0.1%

Repairs and Maintenance

         1,200

0.6%

         5,050

2.1%

Wages

      40,000

19.3%

      53,000

21.7%

Superannuation

         2,967

1.4%

         4,770

2.0%

Total Expenses

    125,658

60.7%

    154,378

63.1%

Net Profit

      81,257

39.3%

      90,122

36.9%

Chartreuse Enterprises

Income Statement

Particulars

               2,017

               2,016

 Variance

Sales

          157,500

          187,450

–         29,950

Consultancy fees

             49,375

             57,000

–           7,625

Interest income

                     40

                     50

–                 10

Total Revenue

          206,915

          244,500

–         37,585

Less: Expenses

Cost of sales

             57,917

             63,595

–           5,678

Bank charges

                   290

                   350

–                 60

Depreciation

             13,492

             15,863

–           2,372

Interest expense

               9,583

             11,500

–           1,917

Printing

                   210

                   250

–                 40

Repairs and Maintenance

               1,200

               5,050

–           3,850

Wages

             40,000

             53,000

–         13,000

Superannuation

               2,967

               4,770

–           1,803

Total Expenses

           125,658

           154,378

–         28,720

Net Profit

             81,257

             90,122

–           8,865

Net Profit %

                       0

                       0

                     0

As per the trend analysis above, we can see a number of accounts which are at risk in the given trail balance and there is a risk of material misstatement in a few of them and thus they need significant audit attention.

Sl. No.

Account Name

Audit Assertion and risk

1.

Sales

The overall revenue has declined by 15.37% and the direct sales has declined by 15.98%. The net profit has also been on the lower side as compared to the last year by 9.84% and it needs to be checked if it is due to the fall in prices or fall in quantity or it is due to the some other external reasons. In terms of the common size statement, the sales percentage has been more or less same (Saeidi, 2012).

2.

Depreciation expenses

It can be seen that the percentage of depreciation expenses has remained 6.5% of revenue in each of the years. Furthermore, it has declined by almost 15% as compared to the last year. Being a fixed expense, it should not have gone down so estimations and judgement of the management in this regard, the useful lives, etc. needs to be checked. It also needs to be seen if the company or management has made any major acquisition or disposal of the assets (Jefferson, 2017).

3

Wages

Wages being a direct expenses, was expected to decrease in the proportion of the sales whereas in the given case, the same has fallen by around 24.53% and in case, the expense is measured as a percentage of the overall sales for the year, it is seen that it was 21.7% of sales in 2016 and dropped to 19.3% in 2017. It needs to be checked if the number of labour resources have been cut or the wages have been declined (Sithole, et al., 2017).

 The audit assertions for each of the given accounts has been explained in detail in the above question. Now the audit procedures to be employed for checking each of these accounts are shown below:

Sales: Here pareto analysis can be employed to do the audit of sales, vouching of the invoices should be done, besides the prices and the quantity sold for both the years needs to be checked(Knechel & Salterio, 2016). The top contributing part number or the products can be considered for the audit purposes and it needs to be checked if the revenue recognition policy and standards have been adhered to.

Depreciation: Careful scrutiny needs to be done by the audit team in this regard. It needs to be checked if the acquisitions or disposals have been done during the year and is there a change in the method of depreciation or the rate of depreciation(Raiborn, et al., 2016). The auditor should also check if the proper accounting standard has been used for accounting of the depreciation expenses and if the management has conducted physical verification of assets during the year.

Wages: Since wages is direct expenses, it should have fallen in proportion of the sales but it has fallen more in proportion of the sales and therefore it needs to be checked if the number of labourers has been reduced or the wage per hour has been reduced(Bizfluent, 2017). It also needs to be checked if the Minimum Wages Act has been adhered too and if the company is giving adequate security to its labourers.

Conclusion & Recommendation 

  1. In the given case, the audit partner of the firm has suggested that the fraud risk checking is not to be conducted for the given client Chartreuse Enterprises as the company is a very professional and authentic one and can be trusted(Dichev, 2017). This instance is against the principle of professional scepticism, as per which even if the client has maintained all the work ethics and has prepared and presented the annual accounts in the best possible manner, even then he should be checked and audited thoroughly with respect to the audit. Furthermore, from the preliminary audit analytical procedures, it can be seen that there are many areas in which audit can be conducted and which a deviation from the normal course of business are. There has been a sharp decline in the sales, cost of sales and also the profitability and hence the entity should be checked for fraud risk factors. Some of the heads under which fraud analysis can be done are as follows:
  2. The superannuation expenses has decreased by more than 37% as compared to the last year and therefore it is expected that a large number of employees would have left the company, the same needs to be checked from employee register.
  3. There is a sharp decline in the repairs and maintenance expenditure and it needs to be seen if accounting has been done correctly and all the present year expenses has been booked and not shifted to future years(Choy, 2018).
  • Finally, there is also a significant decline in the interest expense by 16.67% as compared to the last year, which shows that either the company is using less debt or it has made repayment of the debt in the current year(Linden & Freeman, 2017).

These are few of the major fraud risk factors, which needs to be examined and audited.

References 

Belton, P., 2017. Competitive Strategy: Creating and Sustaining Superior Performance. London: Macat International ltd.

Bizfluent, 2017. Advantages & Disadvantages of Internal Control. [Online]
Available at: https://bizfluent.com/info-8064250-advantages-disadvantages-internal-control.html
[Accessed 13 September 2018].

Choy, Y. K., 2018. Cost-benefit Analysis, Values, Wellbeing and Ethics: An Indigenous Worldview Analysis. Ecological Economics, p. 145.

Dichev, I., 2017. On the conceptual foundations of financial reporting. Accounting and Business Research, 47(6), pp. 617-632.

Goldmann, K., 2016. Financial Liquidity and Profitability Management in Practice of Polish Business. Financial Environment and Business Development, 4(3), pp. 103-112.

Islam, M. A. & Islam, M. A., 2011. Environmental incidents in a developing country and corporate environmental disclosures: A study of a multinational gas company. Society and Business Review, 6(3), pp. 229-248.

Jefferson, M., 2017. Energy, Complexity and Wealth Maximization, R. Ayres. Springer, Switzerland. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, pp. 353-354.

Knechel, W. & Salterio, S., 2016. Auditing:Assurance and Risk. fourth ed. New York: Routledge.

Linden, B. & Freeman, R., 2017. Profit and Other Values: Thick Evaluation in Decision Making. Business Ethics Quarterly, 27(3), pp. 353-379.

Raiborn, C., Butler, J. & Martin, K., 2016. The internal audit function: A prerequisite for Good Governance. Journal of Corporate Accounting and Finance, 28(2), pp. 10-21.

Saeidi, F., 2012. Audit expectations gap and corporate fraud: Empirical evidence from Iran. African Journal of Business Management, 6(23), pp. 7031-41.

Sithole, S., Chandler, P., Abeysekera, I. & Paas, F., 2017. Benefits of guided self-management of attention on learning accounting. Journal of Educational Psychology, 109(2), p. 220.

Trieu, V., 2017. Getting value from Business Intelligence systems: A review and research agenda. Decision Support Systems, Volume 93, pp. 111-124.

Werner, M., 2017. Financial process mining – Accounting data structure dependent control flow inference. International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Volume 25, pp. 57-80.