Loan Amortization Schedule, Investment Analysis And Capital Restructuring

Particulars

Save Time On Research and Writing
Hire a Pro to Write You a 100% Plagiarism-Free Paper.
Get My Paper

Value

Rate

0.30%

Time

Save Time On Research and Writing
Hire a Pro to Write You a 100% Plagiarism-Free Paper.
Get My Paper

360

Amount

        800,000

Monthly payment

$3,637.16

Particulars

Value

Rate

0.30%

Time

288

Amount

        800,000

Monthly payment

$3,637.16

Loan outstanding after 24 years

$235,208.19

Interest paid in 1st month of 25th year

$705.62

Particulars

Value

Monthly payment

 $       3,637.16

Time

                  360

Amount

 $   800,000.00

Total interest paid

 $   509,378.61

From the evaluation, it can be detected that the total interest paid during the period of 30 years is approximately 60% of the total loan amount. In addition, the major limitation is the term of the loan, while the refinancing is also conducted a draw back.

Particulars

Value

Rate

0.10%

Time

360

Monthly payment

$3,637.16

Present Value

$1,099,143.92

The major difference between the above solution is the difference in interest rate, which directly indicate that borrowing is much more benefits than to lend.

Particulars

Good Inc

Bad Inc

Beta

                      1.80

                    1.20

Market value of equity

 $ 10,000,000,000

 $ 4,000,000,000

Market value of debt

 $ 20,000,000,000

 $ 2,000,000,000

Total

 $ 30,000,000,000

 $ 6,000,000,000

Face value of debt

 $ 22,000,000,000

 $ 2,200,000,000

Years to debt maturity

                         15

                         5

Annual coupon rate

10%

8%

Risk free rate

5%

5%

Return on Market

15%

15%

cost of equity

23.00%

17.00%

WACC

13.00%

13.47%

The calculation is relevantly conducted in the above table, which depicts values of WACC for T. Holdings. The debt and equity combination of Bad Inc is supporting the current capital structure of T. Holdings. Hence, the WACC of 13.47% can be used for T. Holdings.

Particulars

Bad Inc

Beta

                    1.20

Market value of equity

 $ 4,000,000,000

Market value of debt

 $ 2,000,000,000

Total

 $ 6,000,000,000

Face value of debt

 $ 2,200,000,000

Years to debt maturity

                         5

Annual coupon rate

8%

Risk free rate

5%

Return on Market

15%

cost of equity

17.00%

WACC

13.47%

The discount rate of 13.47% can be used for the computation of the NV analysis for the projects proposed to T. Holdings.

Particulars

1

2

3

4

5

Revenue

 $         800,000,000

 $ 960,000,000

 $ 1,152,000,000

 $ 1,382,400,000

 $ 1,658,880,000

Variable cost

 $         240,000,000

 $ 288,000,000

 $    345,600,000

 $    414,720,000

 $    497,664,000

Fixed cost

 $           80,000,000

 $   80,000,000

 $      80,000,000

 $      80,000,000

 $      80,000,000

Payments

 $             2,000,000

 $     2,200,000

 $        2,420,000

 $        2,662,000

 $        2,928,200

Salvage

 $    300,000,000

Depreciation

 $         120,000,000

 $ 120,000,000

 $    120,000,000

 $    120,000,000

 $    120,000,000

EBIT

 $         358,000,000

 $ 469,800,000

 $    603,980,000

 $    765,018,000

 $    658,287,800

Tax

 $           71,600,000

 $   93,960,000

 $    120,796,000

 $    153,003,600

 $    131,657,560

PAT

 $         286,400,000

 $ 375,840,000

 $    483,184,000

 $    612,014,400

 $    526,630,240

Cash flow

 $         406,400,000

 $ 495,840,000

 $    603,184,000

 $    732,014,400

 $    646,630,240

Particulars

1

2

3

4

5

Net working capital

 $           80,000,000

 $   96,000,000

 $    115,200,000

 $    138,240,000

 $    165,888,000

Net Change in working capital

 $   16,000,000

 $      19,200,000

 $      23,040,000

 $      27,648,000

Particulars

0

1

2

3

4

5

Cash Flow

 $        (680,000,000)

 $ 406,400,000

 $    479,840,000

 $    583,984,000

 $    708,974,400

 $ 618,982,240

NPV

 $ 1,207,448,769.49

The calculation conducted in the above table directly indicates positive NPV values, which can allow T. Holding to improve its financial condition in future.

Particulars

Value

Earnings

 $      28,000

Number of shares

           5,000

Dividend per share

 $          5.60

Maureen shares @100

 $           560

Particulars

Value

150 Bonds @1000

 $    150,000

Market value per share

 $             60

Number of shares repurchased

           2,500

Particulars

Value

Earnings Before Interest

 $      28,000

[email protected]%

 $        9,000

Earnings

 $      19,000

Number of shares

           2,500

Dividend per share

 $          7.60

Maureen shares @100

 $           380

Particulars

Value

Unlevered firm

 $           560

Levered firm

 $           380

Investing in Bonds

 $           360

The new condition of Debt-free Inc will be problematic for the shareholders, as the debt-to-equity ratio is 1:1, which will reduce the shareholders’ value and raise debt payments.

Particulars

Value

Earnings

 $   28,000

Tax

 $     5,600

EAT

 $   22,400

Number of shares

        5,000

Dividend per share

 $       4.48

Maureen shares @100

 $        448

Particulars

Value

150 Bonds @1000

 $ 150,000

Market value per share

 $          60

Number of shares repurchased

        2,500

Particulars

Value

Earnings Before Interest

 $   28,000

[email protected]%

 $     9,000

Earnings

 $   19,000

Tax

 $     3,800

EAT

 $   15,200

Number of shares

        2,500

Dividend per share

 $       6.08

Maureen shares @100

 $        304

Particulars

Value

Unlevered firm

 $        448

Levered firm

 $        304

Investing in Bonds

 $        360

The debt combination of the firm is problematic, as it will reduce shareholders values and increase debt payments.

Bekaert, G. and Hodrick, R., 2017. International financial management. Cambridge University Press.

DeAngelo, H. and Stulz, R.M., 2015. Liquid-claim production, risk management, and bank capital structure: Why high leverage is optimal for banks. Journal of Financial Economics116(2), pp.219-236.

Robb, A.M. and Robinson, D.T., 2014. The capital structure decisions of new firms. The Review of Financial Studies27(1), pp.153-179.

Zeitun, R. and Tian, G., 2014. Capital structure and corporate performance: evidence from Jordan.