Course Learning Outcomes

Occupation therapy involves working with individuals who are physically or mentally challenged (Drolet,2014). It makes use of a systematic process of assessment in order to design interventions to assist individuals or a group of individuals with activities of daily living. Occupations involve activities that add a meaningful dimension to the life of individuals. Involving in occupational activities promote all round development in terms of physical and mental health wellness. Occupations can be classified under physical, social, cultural, personal, virtual or temporal categories. The standard of quality of the occupational performance varies from individual to individual. Some of the important elements that affect the ability of the individuals to efficiently assimilate the occupational therapy includes the environment in which the therapy is delivered and the nature of the activity.

Occupational therapy provides a platform to the challenged individuals to participate in real-life situational contexts and enhance their ability to maintain a sustainable living. Occupational therapy experts actively engage in imparting therapy so as to provide a meaningful and adequate livelihood and attain positive outcomes. The underlying philosophical theme of providing occupational therapy is based upon the utility of occupations in validating health promotion. The various areas covered under health promotion includes, restoration, maintenance of health, prevention of disease and injury and adaptation. The overall aim of occupational therapy is to preserve and promote wellness at the individual, community and population level so as to inculcate virtues of education, research, advocacy and practice (Davis et al., 2016). However, it is critical to note here that the philosophy behind the occupational therapy practice has evolved to a great extent over the years.

The philosophy is a combination of humanism, romanticism and pragmatism ideals. The elementary ideas behind the rational of the inclusion of occupational therapy include a wide range of factors. Firstly, occupation is believed to elicit a positive impact on the overall health and well-being. Secondly, Occupation raises the standard of life both culturally and on a personal basis. Thirdly, occupation helps in time management and improves people’s perception on an individual basis. Following the world war II the perception associated with the philosophy of occupation therapy emerged to be a constricted or rather a more narrowed down philosophy. Through the years the philosophy has evolved and in context of recent times, three important theories are closely linked to the theme of occupational therapy. The first theme explains the importance of occupation in terms of maintenance of health.

Philosophy behind Occupational Therapy Practice

The second theme emphasises on the fact that the defined theories are broadly constructed upon a holistic framework and the third theme focuses on the central components of the occupational therapy to be people and the corresponding environment where the therapy is administered. However, a major proportion of the theories designed by the American Occupational Therapy Association have been criticised for only focusing on the therapeutic aspect rather than emphasising upon the multicultural aspect (AOTA,2015). The modern trend in the world of occupational therapy has witnessed a major transformation and professionals in recent times work with a broader target audience and are not restricted to just patients (Pendelton & Schultz-Krohn, 2017). Broader target audience include occupational therapists working with refugees and homeless individuals.

An occupational therapist assists a client and administers occupational therapy in a sequential manner. The occupational therapy primarily comprises of three important steps that include, assessment, designing of an intervention followed by evaluation of successful outcomes (Durocher,Gibson & Rappolt,2014). The occupational therapists resort to this framework in order to promote health and uphold the structural composition of the framework. According to scientific literatures there are two important practice frameworks to dispense occupational therapy (Enderby,John,Petheram, 2013). The first framework is known as the occupational therapy practice framework (OTPF) and the second therapy is known as the Canadian Model of Client Centred Enablement (CMCE). The OTPF framework would be critically analysed by me in this section. The Occupational Therapy Practice Framework is widely popular across the Unites States of America and forms a part of the core competency (AOTA,2015).

The framework is broadly classified under two segments that include, the domain and the process. The domain includes the environmental factors such as the condition of the patient, level of individual motivation, the ability of the patient to perform a set of assigned task and the ability of the therapist to access the client and successfully design an appropriate intervention (Fortune & Kennedy,2014). On the other hand the process takes care of the method by virtue of which the change would be implemented to design a strategy to help the patient. It should be mentioned here that the Canadian Model focuses on pre-evaluating the strengths and the available resources of the patients and the therapists prior to designing an action plan and measuring outcomes.

On critically evaluating the OTPF framework it can be said that the framework comprises of domains that are grouped under six broad headings and each of the sub headings are categorized under sub-sub headings classified on a hierarchical basis. Hence it can be said that the categorization is extremely complex that makes it extremely difficult to follow and understand (Davis et al., 2016). It can also be said that the OTPF framework violates four important aspects that are important in order to establish a conceptual framework. The four important aspects can be enlisted as the rule of precision, the rule of parsimony, the rule of exclusivity and the rule of exhaustiveness. The rule of precision implies to the fact that a designated term must be used to address a specified subject and must not be used as a generalised term (Davis et al., 2016). The rule of parsimony can be used to describe the fact that a particular term should only be used to describe another term if there is an existence of a specific association or a logical explanation. On the other hand, the rule of exclusivity must be used to address a differentiation from the higher level category and the rule of exhaustiveness defines clearly that all relevant aspects must be classifiable in order to make it easy for the therapists to understand the theory and comply with the particulars while practicing (Hildenbrand & Lamb,2013). Hence, it can be said that the two considerations of the OTPF theory namely the domain and the process are extremely complicated to be understood by the therapists without external assistance (Nelson & Chapman,2015). It should be crucially mentioned here that particularly the domain aspect is extremely complex on account of a distorted structural organization and it must be reformed in order to make the theory lucid and easy to comprehend.

The Occupational Therapy Three-Step Framework

Tikanga can be defined as a Maori context that deals with a diverse range of entities such as culture, custom, ethic, formality, method and protocol. The word ‘Tikanga’ originates from the Maori word ‘Tika’ and refers to the art of doing things as per the Maori culture (Hopkirk & Wilson,2014). The word ‘Tika’ is synonymous to ‘true’ or ‘correct’. Research papers have predicted the maintenance of a poor standard of indigenous health all over the world (Hopkirk & Wilson,2014). The Maori or the traditional community based at New Zealand also experience a poor quality of health. In order to deal effectively address the issue delivering occupational therapy to raise the quality of the community members based at the Maori community was considered. A research study conducted by Hopkirk and Wilson (2014) aimed to utilize the indigenous knowledge in order to effectively initiate culturally safe therapy practices. The research study successfully related the key elements of health determinants among indigenous people to be spirituality, holistic nature, environmental influence and client responsive practice. A major difference in terms of importance on occupation and cultural competence were recorded to be pivotal in order to promote complete wellness (Mroz et al., 2015). Therefore, it can be commented in this context that delivering occupational therapy to the indigenous population of Maori community would broadly comprise of using appropriate framework to ensure cultural safety and at the same time impart professional occupational practice. In order to establish a clear understanding of the manner in which occupational therapy can be assimilated within the Maori community could possibly include,

Incorporating a sense of belonging or ‘Whanaungtanga’ among the community members by means of creating connections or supporting the concept of inclusiveness. This could be done by encouraging team work and maintaining a whanau environment by including Kuia and Koroua. Measuring the ability of the community members to help one another or ‘Manakitanga’. This could be achieved by encouraging community members to actively listen to one another, support one another and follow up. Therapists could make use of the best information and resources to inculcate the spirit of sharing and cooperation among the community members (Nayar & Stanley, 2014). The concept of unity and oneness or ‘kotahitanga’ can be achieved through creating an awareness about unity, cooperation and togetherness. This could be done through education and awareness and indulging the community members in interactive sessions. The concept of undertaking responsibility for a course of action or ‘Rangatiratanga’ can be delivered to the members of the community through education and information. The therapists should actively engage in creating an atmosphere so as to encourage the members to undertake independent choices (Scaffa & Reitz,2013). Hence, these are some of the ways in which occupational therapy can be dispensed to the indigenous members of the Maori community.

References:

American Occupational Therapy Association. (2015). Standards of practice for occupational therapy. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 69(6913410057).

Davis, E. S., Stav, W. B., Womack, J., & Kannenberg, K. (2016). Driving and community mobility. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 70.

Drolet, M. J. (2014). The axiological ontology of occupational therapy: A philosophical analysis. Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 21(1), 2-10.

Durocher, E., Gibson, B. E., & Rappolt, S. (2014). Occupational justice: A conceptual review. Journal of Occupational Science, 21(4), 418-430.

Enderby, P., John, A., & Petheram, B. (2013). Therapy outcome measures for rehabilitation professionals: speech and language therapy, physiotherapy, occupational therapy. John Wiley & Sons.

Fortune, T., & Kennedy?Jones, M. (2014). Occupation and its relationship with health and wellbeing: The threshold concept for occupational therapy. Australian occupational therapy journal, 61(5), 293-298.

Hildenbrand, W. C., & Lamb, A. J. (2013). Occupational therapy in prevention and wellness: Retaining relevance in a new health care world. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 67(3), 266-271.

Hopkirk, J., & Wilson, L. H. (2014). A call to wellness–Whitiwhitia i te ora: Exploring M?ori and occupational therapy perspectives on health. Occupational therapy international, 21(4), 156-165.

Mroz, T. M., Pitonyak, J. S., Fogelberg, D., & Leland, N. E. (2015). Client centeredness and health reform: key issues for occupational therapy. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 69(5), 6905090010p1-6905090010p8.

Nayar, S., & Stanley, M. (Eds.). (2014). Qualitative research methodologies for occupational science and therapy. Routledge.

Nelson, D. L., & Chapman, L. M. (2015). Occupational analysis and synthesis. Ergoterapeuten, 3, 47-53.

Pendleton, H. M., & Schultz-Krohn, W. (2017). Pedretti’s Occupational Therapy-E-Book: Practice Skills for Physical Dysfunction. Elsevier Health Sciences.

Scaffa, M. E., & Reitz, S. M. (2013). Occupational therapy community-based practice settings. FA Davis.