Domestic Violence in New Zealand

Discuss about the Social Work for Domestic Violence.

The family is usually associated with shelter – a spot where people look for affection, protection, shelter, and defense. Nevertheless, the signs point that it is further a station where hazards exist, and raises some extremely severe forms of brutality committed against females. Violence in the household sphere is performed by men who happen to be or were, in situations of trust, confidence, and authority. Although the influence of physical assault might be more apparent than emotional damage, repeated shaming, and abuses, forced confinement, restrictions on social movement, repeated intimidations of violence and harm, and deprivation of monetary resources are more indirect and stealthy forms of brutality (Krizsán & Paantjens, 2016).

This essay is structured to address the issue of domestic violence, especially the form perpetrated against women, focusing on New Zealand. A brief about the history of domestic violence in the country is given, concentrating on the women group. Along with that, legislative responses to these crimes, and the part service providers play is discussed. The knowledge and skills of specialists that are put into use are further elaborated. Finally, intervention processes, current issues, a summarization of the arguments and some implications of practice are discussed.

Domestic violence exists in about all societies on the globe. The expression can be analyzed on different bases. Brutality against the partner, kids or aged are some regularly found problems. There are different types of strategies that are used by the aggressor against the sufferer. Physical harassment, emotional harassment, psychological harm or denial, economic exploitation, and similar kind of damages are the general sorts of injustices that are experienced by the sufferers. Domestic violence happens when the individual perpetrating it has authority issues. Some that perpetrate such sadistic acts suffered the harassment themselves previously in life. Some believe this is the manner they ought to handle people, as this mode of restraint is all they understand. For people, they believe this is an agreeable way to prove they have concern for them though it’s not. There are justifications presented by those that perpetrate such deeds, which are often objectionable. Meanwhile, it is an issue that remains ignored as several individuals face it without sharing it (Trevillion et al., 2012).

Historical Development

Domestic violence is not just an obstacle of the lower income countries. It is quite common in advanced countries too. Domestic violence is the copy of the contemporary pseudo-civilized community. There is no room for brutality in the developed world. However, the amount of incidents that are recorded every year fosters a high alert. Besides, this isn’t the whole picture, since; maximum of the events go unrecorded or overlooked in daily life. Domestic violence has driven individuals to wasting their breaths over madness. Many nations overlook domestic violence on females if they do not implement steps to prevent it. There is considerable effort to put in comprehending why people behave with others unjustly. This pattern of harassment has grown too familiar; however, people still have problems in not publicizing it. Sufferers require alternatives to assist them to overlook terror when attempting to escape from dangerous conditions involving harassment. It is a critical trend crawling in our community and must be handled with strong hands (Devries et al., 2013).

Domestic violence is one prevalent, lethal offense that impacts many New Zealanders with severe physical, emotional and financial consequences. Crime and trauma stats reveal how serious an issue of domestic violence happens to be in New Zealand. This kind of violence is a principal reason for pain and loss in women and heads to short-term and long-term wellness issues like psychological disorder and sexual health concerns. New Zealand has a critical rate of relative and sexual partner abuse. A horrifying 80 percent of occurrences go unrecorded— hence everything known about domestic violence in the society is just one-dimensional (“Family violence: 525,000 New Zealanders harmed every year – National – NZ Herald News”, 2016).

Before 1970, police was hesitant to intrude in internal conflict as a result of the general and social beliefs about family relations. There was a requirement for a better system to imprison the culprit and help the sufferer to feel secure. The progression of New Zealand domestic violence rules and the difficulties faced on the way reflect global developments and display large-scale social trends. Before the 1980s, the New Zealand cops embraced a conservative stance in reacting to domestic violence (Buzawa, Buzawa & Stark, 2015). Nevertheless, related abroad events, commencing from 1970 the actions of the feminist campaign elevated consciousness about the issue, ultimately pointing to important variations in order. New Zealand was deeply influenced by the announcement of the outcomes of the 1984 Minneapolis Experiment and different pro-arrest drives ensued. The New Zealand Police embraced a more active strategy while handling domestic violence named as the Pro-Arrest rule, in 1987. Under this policy, sufferers are presented with proper and prompt assistance and culprits are imprisoned without an official report. New Zealand cops enforced this rule, and some the other important reviews and constituents played a significant part in the formulation of this rule. The very latest pro-arrest action, amended from the 1995’s Domestic Violence Act has continued till date to be effectual (“Domestic Violence Act 1995 No 86 (as at 01 October 2014), Public Act Contents – New Zealand Legislation”, 2016).

Client Characteristics

The predominance, cruelty, and pattern of domestic violence, admittance to assistance and ability to exit rocky relations vary within a society, with particular crowds being weaker than the rest. Domestic violence is quite prevailing within particular societies, like in rural New Zealand and certain Indigenous inhabitants (Kuokkanen, 2015). The extremity of assaults also seems to change within socioeconomic, age and social units. Certain women might be more susceptible to becoming sufferers and less competent of leaving violent relations based on specific determinants of age, area, race, Indigenous situation and their speech skills (O’Brien et al., 2013).

Notwithstanding the presence of law and political operations aiming the decrease of various patterns of violence against females, females in New Zealand suffer massive amounts of domestic and physical abuse. Information on domestic abuse against females in New Zealand is limited. Information is primarily reliant upon recording and logging systems and is doubtful to correctly depict the prevalence of domestic violence towards females in New Zealand. In 2014, the police in New Zealand reported 7163 episodes of ‘male assaults female’. In 2013, Family Court imparted more than 2000 Protection Orders by the terms of the 1995 Domestic Violence Act. Ninety percentage of offenders listed in Protection Order forms were men. The National Collective of Independent Women’s Refuges got 81,720 emergency alarms, and 2940 females and adolescents reached out to protection services in 2013 (“Violence-Against-Women“, 2016). The Dunedin Multidisciplinary Health and Development Study or the Dunedin Study, a continuous group survey of 1037 Dunedin inhabitants born amid 1972-73, discovered that by the age of 21, 27% of women review associates informed they had been bodily harassed by a spouse, and 22% of male review associates stated they had committed violence towards their spouse. Still, in opposition to several other studies, the Dunedin study further discovered higher ratios of domestic violence towards males than towards females; moreover, 34% of male review associates stating physical harassment by a spouse and 37% of women review associates announcing they had committed abuse towards their spouse (Poulton, Moffitt & Silva, 2015).

The main section of law in New Zealand concerning domestic abuse is the 1995 Domestic Violence Act.  Some noticeable changes to this law have happened in recent times. From the middle of 2010, because of the passing of the Domestic Violence Bill in 2009, the New Zealand cops were provided the authority to circulate “Police Safety Orders” (PSOs) in situations where they believe domestic violence has happened or might happen.  Such rules have an instant impact and can continue till five days.  The cops do not require the at-risk individual’s approval to declare these Police Safety Orders, and the individual who is directed to an application ought to leave the specific location, not reach out to the individual at risk, and abdicate any guns for the duration of the PSO.  Whenever the rules are violated, the cops may imprison the individual and produce them before the bar (Koziol-McLain et al., 2015).  Following an assessment carried out via the New Zealand Police, the orders were doing well and providing a breather for families and opportunity for care groups to evaluate what is required in the condition.  A sum of 5,242 PSOs was published in the initial twelve months of exertion. The very Bill introduced various additional reforms directed at presenting valuable devices in facilitating the reply of the criminal prosecution section to domestic violence  (Buchanan, 2013).

Legislative Responses

Family Violence Prevention Coordinating Committee (FVPCC) was founded in the Family Violence Conference (1985) to study Pro-Arrest acknowledgments deeply. FVPCC, including government firms and society associations and was administered by the Social Welfare Department. The panel proposed an arrangement and alliance between different firms and authorities who are associated with phases of domestic violence, advancement of an interagency program for domestic violence (Pressman, Cameron & Rothery, 2013). Efforts were put in to settle complainants in contact with community service firms so they can be presented with continuous assistance and captures were done in situations where an apparent assault was proved without the requirement for a formal charge from the sufferer (Michau et al., 2015).

Several victims of domestic violence will not reach out to the cops or any other bureau to lodge an official complaint towards their offensive spouse because of some obstacles like capital, safe housing, well-being, lay-off. Health care suppliers are hence well situated to involve in quick description, assistance, and guidance. Government firms are reliant on information of harassment initiated from external references. A health care specialist has established a schedule that involves suggesting the victim to a professional domestic violence firm, cops, attorney, and minor security services like Child, Youth, and Family, whenever needed (“Family Violence Assessment and Intervention Guideline”, 2016).

The FVPCC understood that a shift in arrest tactics only would not substantially decrease reoffending, and organized a mediation scheme in 1991, the Hamilton Abuse Intervention Pilot Project (HAIPP) to observe the devices of domestic violence by the ‘Power and Authority’ model. The purpose of the scheme was to hold the brutality, and this is accomplished by defending, encouraging and familiarizing sufferers and reforming the offender’s conduct by responsibility and recovery (Ghandour, Campbell & Lloyd, 2015).

Shakti New Zealand is a non-profit society based group assigned to operate towards women’s development and empowerment, along with intervening, preventing and spreading awareness in domestic violence situations across the society. They collaborate with other women support group to provide support and provide intervention in critical situations. The principal locus of AWC is to provide 24-hour crisis service to females, ethnic women and young survivors of domestic brutality and counsel them. Shakti takes the initiative to train women in the community and create awareness among them about gender equity, social rights, prevention programs and refuges they can turn to in case of need (Le Brocque et al., 2014).

This training and awareness program is a good initiative on Shakti’s behalf, as it provides the victims of domestic violence with an option to learn to defend herself, decide what to do and how to do. Records say that domestic violence support providers and initiative societies have helped empowering the women and making them stand up against the harassments and assaults they are made to face at home or at the hands of their near ones (Walton et al., 2015). All these programs, trainings and service  models indicate that providing a victim or a possible one with support, encouragement and resources to stand up against violence and stop it for well and good (Ellis, 2012). While working on cases of violence for the last 20 years, Shakti has understood one thing – violence is a way for offenders to feel in control, and it is mostly related to physical control, and is implemented mostly on the weak and defenseless. Shakti has extended its service in most of the Asian, African and Middle Eastern countries, and teamed up with regional NGOs to create a strengthening environment for victims in those regions.

The New Zealand Family Violence Clearinghouse database also recognizes Shakti as a tried and tested model for supporting violence victims. This group shows great practice around New Zealand and other regions by advocating for proper legislative actions for victims and establishment of sheltering services.

What makes Shakti work, is proper and timely evaluation of the services they are providing, and how much effective they are, and what more is needed to be done if there is any gap (Cattaneo & Goodman, 2015). They also regularly coordinate with all the support groups to check with their progressive mitigation activities. For native victims Shakti has built up separate safe houses where they can get proper shelter, therapy, counseling, along with legal, confidential and empowering support. The victims are also provided with trainings and education that can assist them in future. They have separate programs ad advisory groups for women, children and couples.

The New Zealand Government has committed to provide educating programs to victims of domestic violence. They planned to do so by incorporating Domestic Violence Orders, modified laws, provision of shelters, health benefits, violence assistance, along with modified systems and models to assist the victims after they were assaulted. These intervening processes are crucial, as they are the support system of the victims when they are alone, weak and injured. However, these do not do the actual work of preventing the heinous act, which is most important, as these processes are implemented after the attack happened (Krishnan et al., 2012).

Modifications of strategies and assistance procedures are now given importance. The existing processes have been given a new dimension so that they can actually cut off the issue at its root and stop violent incidents from occurring. An audit embraced by the Commonwealth Government’s Partnership Against Domestic Violence (PADV) distinguished that the path forward to avoid viciousness against women incorporates working with youngsters to break the intergenerational cycle of brutality; working with casualties and culprits to break the cycle of savagery; and working with groups to instruct against savagery (Dillon et al., 2013). Health care providers make sure the victims are properly attended to, and they make sure all kinds of assistance are provided to them. In case of potential victims interveners try to reach out the source of the violence and remove the risk factors from there and prevent the act from happening. Support groups and community services are formulating projects to develop this idea of uprooting the issue, for the last time (Gordon, 2016).

Some best practice cases of incorporated or synergistic domestic aggression  services that consider the social, communal and geographic dissimilarities and size of their region incorporate The Domestic Abuse Intervention Project (DAIP) from Duluth USA, the Hamilton Abuse Intervention Project (HAIP) from New Zealand, the Multi-Agency Risk Assessment Conferences (MARAC), from Cardiff, Wales and from Australia, the Interagency Family Violence Intervention Program (Pahl, 2016).

One of the best-known incorporated reaction models is The Domestic Abuse Intervention Project, referred to generally as the Duluth Model. It is psycho-educational program formed to intervene acts of domestic violence. It was formed with an idea to extract a positive outcome, which the socio-political approaches could not, and also to contribute to the shift towards cognitive-behavioral treatments. It facilitates male abusers’ projects and women’ undertakings in the group and has additionally created awareness ideology, preparing and group advancing activities, all of which are upheld by, and worked in pair with, the criminal equity services (Lorenz, 2013). The Brainwave Trust is additionally another New Zealand case of a fine practice model alongside the Pacific Prevention of Domestic Violence Programme.

Assistance providers always do not have access to extreme measures that are sometimes required for severely horrible cases. In such cases their prime focus is on intervening the act as much as possible, or if not, then providing immediate assistance to the victim, along with creating awareness and changing mindsets about the extremity of such acts (Ellsberg et al., 2015). Evaluations of groups and support centres that work for such causes have shown that there is a dire need of long-term solutions. Prompt reactions always do not work. The need of the hour is the eradication of violence from its origin by approaching with a mindset of decreasing extremity levels and bettering the overall statistics of violence in New Zealand. The good work done by Shakti has been recognized world over, and victims have requested the organization to extend their helping hands and assist them to stop this violence. Shakti’s Project Women Against Violence built inter-continental relationships with NGOs from Asian countries and was involved in intervention programs with them (“Shakti International – Shakti women’s refuge”, 2016).

As indicated by the New Zealand Family Violence Clearinghouse, an evaluation group at Auckland University, more than 800,000, or 35 percent of New Zealand’s populace, have encountered physical or sexual savagery by a close accomplice. Whenever mental or psychological mistreatment is counted, the figure rises, with 55 percent of women reporting viciousness from their life partner or accomplice. Nonetheless, because of the sheer volume of numbers, each day several battered and manhandled women are being directed in the opposite direction of women’ shelters across New Zealand. Specialists say that safe houses across the country are confronting financial deficiencies, and state backed aids are feeble. A disturbing figure while considering viciousness against women in New Zealand has achieved pestilence levels. Human rights advocates say the New Zealand government needs to dispense more capital to innovative services including a domestic harassment emergency hotline, women’s safe houses, and an extensive variety of support assistances that can help casualties revamp their lives (Roberts, Chamberlain, & Delfabbro, 2015).

New Zealand has generally shown the path in advancing women in government life. It was additionally the primary nation on the planet to give women the privilege to vote and has had two female PMs. In spite of this record and its high positioning in worldwide monetary and personal satisfaction lists, women’s rights specialists say domestic aggression is a concealed infection, cursing New Zealand families. Police are leaving numerous domestic aggression occurrences and not regarding them as wrongdoings. 70 percent of the brutality that police manage is personal accomplice viciousness, cops do not have enough preparation to perceive the indications of abusive behavior at home and they do not generally do what is expected to give a lady a chance to recount her side of the story (Richardson, Thom & McKenna, 2013). Figures from the New Zealand Family Violence Clearinghouse (2016) show 95,080 family viciousness examinations were dispatched in 2013 in any case, of those examinations, just 37,880 or 40 percent of them were recorded as offenses. Furthermore, the quantity of individuals being charged has dropped to not as much as half of the aggregate number of cases explored. Specialists say that the police are being compelled by political leaders to keep the official counts of recorded domestic abuse cases down to give the feeling that the legislature is tending to the issue. There are 371 police headquarters all through New Zealand and 52 family savagery facilitators (New Zealand Family Violence Clearinghouse, 2016). These family savagery facilitators audit cases to ensure appropriate police methods are pursued and point casualties to organizations in and outside of the legislature. Notwithstanding, that isn’t going on all the time and that organizers are either excessively over-burdened with cases, making it impossible to survey every one of them or don’t have enough skill in taking care of aggressive behavior at home cases to carry out their employments (Chappell & Curtin, 2013).

Many women stay in the asylums for a considerable length of time in light of the fact that as safe house coordinators and women’s rights activists say, the Ministry of Social Development and Housing New Zealand, the two administrative organizations that evaluate and relegate lodging for casualties of domestic harassment, are making them hold up too long to get lodging help. New Zealand has around 60 women’s havens and each can house 3-5 women a night, some with their youngsters. That is around 200-300 women and kids a night across the country. Nonetheless, with the developing rate of domestic abuse the New Zealand government needs to dispense as much as 10 times the resources and capital to manage the issue. Until the financing is found and the issue organized by the government officials, manhandled women, and their youngsters, will keep on falling through the crevices in New Zealand’s police, court, and lodging frameworks (Fergusson, McLeod & Horwood, 2013).

Conclusion

Approaches to manage domestic abuse should be presented by examination from both New Zealand and abroad, showing the ampleness of different techniques. There is an expanding collection of confirmations that show that the extent of approaches can be feasible in keeping away from severity against women or repeat abuse. It is vital, regardless, that in altering programs from abroad or other New Zealander social units, consideration is provided to vital characteristics of the area situation in which activities are to be executed and whether the framework ought to be changed in like way.

Taken all in all, the discoveries displayed in this essay propose that there are various particular zones that can be focused to forestall domestic aggression and lessen rehash exploitation. Coordination and cooperation crosswise over parts and over all levels of government and non-government ought to be a basic guideline supporting any method to deal with the avoidance of, and intercession with, domestic abuse. Enhancing coordination between domestic abuse and youngster security aids help with avoiding early experience with domestic harassment in personal relations is required. Techniques must concentrate not just on the avoidance of early introduction to domestic abuse, but additionally manage any related physical and sexual harassment, disregard and psychological mistreatment in an all-encompassing way. A comprehensive approach that coordinates with the impacts of kids’ exposure to abusive behavior at home and other abuse will keep the intergenerational transportation of savage mentalities and practices and/or ensuing exploitation.

Expanding the accessibility and attention to administrations for casualties and culprits, upgrading referral instruments and enhancing coordinated effort between assistance suppliers guarantee that the unpredictable needs of all gatherings can be met through an incorporated administration framework. Improving linkages between criminal equity forms, support aids and avoidance projects would likewise offer assistance. It is essential that a more prominent level of backing is offered to women and their youngsters all through the legitimate procedure, and that obstructions counteracting access to equity, especially for helpless women, are overcome. Executing early mediation and training programs focused at youngsters, including school-based projects that mean to shape suitable states of mind towards women and brutality, which has been recognized as the most critical techniques in breaking the cycle of viciousness is a decent procedure.

A more noteworthy concentration amount must be used on auxiliary aversion programs that aim families that have been recognized as being at danger of aggressive behavior at home, which requires procedures and danger appraisal devices to distinguish early signs or hazard components for savagery. It is especially essential that there are projects focused towards and custom fitted to the requirements of those women at an expanded danger of domestic abuse or who might be more averse to get to care centers, including Indigenous women, women from CALD foundations, pregnant women, more young women and women living in provincial and remote groups. Methodologies to address the unbalanced rate of cozy accomplice brutality among Indigenous individuals ought to likewise take an all encompassing perspective and expect to address the scope of societal, cultural, unit, family and individual elements found to expand the danger of aggressive behavior at home for Indigenous women.

Tending to liquor and other substance use issues among both culprits and casualties of domestic abuse, including through the advancement of associations between treatment aids and violence projects would be successful. Ceaseless endeavors to enhance group dispositions towards viciousness against women and speak about continuing misguided judgments in regards to the continuation, nature and agreeableness of brutality against women are vital alongside expanding the inclusion of men and young men in the improvement of projects intended to avert savagery against women by changing male states of mind and practices. All together for these procedures to be successful, it is essential that lessons from past projects are paid attention to and the execution issues depicted above are tended to. What’s more, further top to bottom exploration ought to be attempted into the nature and degree of aggressive behavior at home, especially in powerless groups, and projects ought to be liable to continuous observing and assessment to figure out what is compelling and in what conditions.

References

Buchanan, K. (2013). Domestic Violence Laws in Australia and New Zealand | In Custodia Legis: Law Librarians of Congress. Blogs.loc.gov. Retrieved 22 September 2016, from https://blogs.loc.gov/law/2013/03/domestic-violence-laws-in-australia-and-new-zealand/

Buzawa, E. S., Buzawa, C. G., & Stark, E. D. (2015). Responding to domestic violence: The integration of criminal justice and human services. Sage Publications.

Cattaneo, L. B., & Goodman, L. A. (2015). What is empowerment anyway? A model for domestic violence practice, research, and evaluation. Psychology of Violence, 5(1), 84.

Chappell, L., & Curtin, J. (2013). Does federalism matter? Evaluating state architecture and family and domestic violence policy in Australia and New Zealand. Publius: The Journal of Federalism, 43(1), 24-43.

Devries, K. M., Mak, J. Y., García-Moreno, C., Petzold, M., Child, J. C., Falder, G., … & Pallitto, C. (2013). The global prevalence of intimate partner violence against women. Science, 340(6140), 1527-1528.

Dillon, G., Hussain, R., Loxton, D., & Rahman, S. (2013). Mental and physical health and intimate partner violence against women: a review of the literature. International journal of family medicine, 2013.

Domestic Violence Act 1995 No 86 (as at 01 October 2014), Public Act Contents – New Zealand Legislation. (2016). Legislation.govt.nz. Retrieved from https://www.legislation.govt.nz/act/public/1995/0086/latest/DLM371926.html

Ellis, F. (2012). Rehabilitation programme for adult survivors of childhood sexual abuse. Journal of Public Mental Health, 11(2), 88-92.

Ellsberg, M., Arango, D. J., Morton, M., Gennari, F., Kiplesund, S., Contreras, M., & Watts, C. (2015). Prevention of violence against women and girls: what does the evidence say?. The Lancet, 385(9977), 1555-1566.

Family Violence Assessment and Intervention Guideline: Child abuse and intimate partner violence. (2016). Ministry of Health NZ. Retrieved 23 September 2016, from https://www.health.govt.nz/publication/family-violence-assessment-and-intervention-guideline-child-abuse-and-intimate-partner-violence

Family violence: 525,000 New Zealanders harmed every year – National – NZ Herald News. (2016). The New Zealand Herald. Retrieved from https://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=11634543

Fergusson, D. M., McLeod, G. F., & Horwood, L. J. (2013). Childhood sexual abuse and adult developmental outcomes: Findings from a 30-year longitudinal study in New Zealand. Child abuse & neglect, 37(9), 664-674.

Ghandour, R. M., Campbell, J. C., & Lloyd, J. (2015). Screening and counseling for intimate partner violence: a vision for the future. Journal of Women’s Health, 24(1), 57-61.

Gordon, J. S. (2016). Helping survivors of domestic violence: The effectiveness of medical, mental health, and community services. Routledge.

Koziol-McLain, J., Vandal, A. C., Nada-Raja, S., Wilson, D., Glass, N. E., Eden, K. B., … & Case, J. (2015). A web-based intervention for abused women: the New Zealand isafe randomised controlled trial protocol. BMC public health, 15(1), 1.

Krishnan, S., Subbiah, K., Khanum, S., Chandra, P. S., & Padian, N. S. (2012). An Intergenerational Women’s Empowerment Intervention to Mitigate Domestic Violence Results of a Pilot Study in Bengaluru, India. Violence Against Women, 18(3), 346-370.

Krizsán, A., & Paantjens, M. (2016). Domestic violence: who’s problem?.ΕπιθεÃŽρηση ΚοινωνικÃŽν ΕρευνÃŽν, 117(117), 63-92.

Kuokkanen, R. (2015). Gendered Violence and Politics in Indigenous Communities: The Cases of Aboriginal People in Canada and the Sami in Scandinavia. International Feminist Journal of Politics, 17(2), 271-288.

Le Brocque, R., Kapelle, N., Creagh, S., Meyer, S., Haynes, M., Shaw, E., & Crothers, C. (2014). Respectful Relationships Evaluation.

Lorenz, J. L. (2013). The Duluth Model in practice: Evaluating police and practitioner response to domestic violence.

Michau, L., Horn, J., Bank, A., Dutt, M., & Zimmerman, C. (2015). Prevention of violence against women and girls: lessons from practice. The Lancet, 385(9978), 1672-1684.

New Zealand Family Violence Clearinghouse. (2016). Nzfvc.org.nz. Retrieved 22 September 2016, from https://www.nzfvc.org.nz/

O’Brien, K. L., Cohen, L., Pooley, J. A., & Taylor, M. F. (2013). Lifting the domestic violence cloak of silence: Resilient Australian women’s reflected memories of their childhood experiences of witnessing domestic violence.Journal of Family Violence, 28(1), 95-108.

Pahl, J. (Ed.). (2016). Private violence and public policy: The needs of battered women and the response of the public services. Routledge.

Poulton, R., Moffitt, T. E., & Silva, P. A. (2015). The Dunedin Multidisciplinary Health and Development Study: overview of the first 40 years, with an eye to the future. Social psychiatry and psychiatric epidemiology, 50(5), 679-693.

Pressman, B., Cameron, G., & Rothery, M. (Eds.). (2013). Intervening with assaulted women: Current theory, research, and practice. Routledge.

Richardson, E., Thom, K., & McKenna, B. (2013). The evolution of problem-solving courts in Australia and New Zealand: A trans-Tasman comparative perspective. In Problem Solving Courts (pp. 185-210). Springer New York.

Roberts, D., Chamberlain, P., & Delfabbro, P. (2015). Women’s experiences of the processes associated with the Family Court of Australia in the context of domestic violence: a thematic analysis. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law,22(4), 599-615.

Shakti International – Shakti women’s refuge. (2016). Shakti women’s refuge. Retrieved 15 October 2016, from https://shakti-international.org/

Trevillion, K., Oram, S., Feder, G., & Howard, L. M. (2012). Experiences of domestic violence and mental disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLOS one, 7(12), e51740.

Violence-Against-Women. (2016). nzfvc.org.nz. Retrieved 22 September 2016, from https://nzfvc.org.nz/sites/nzfvc.org.nz/files/DS2-Violence-Against-Women-2014.pdf

Walton PhD, D. P. T., Maria, L., Aerts, D. P. T., Burkhart, D. P. T., & Terry, D. P. T. (2015). Intimate Partner Violence Screening and Implications for Health Care Providers. Online Journal of Health Ethics, 11(1), 5.