Third Party Policing

What Is The Impact Of Community Policing On Crime Rates?

The role of police officers in any society is to maintain law and order. In any normal society there are always law abiding citizens, and those who engage in extra judicial activities. That is what makes the society what it is. In an ever evolving 21^st century world, maintaining law and order can be very challenging for police officers (Uluturk, Guler, & Karakaya, 2017). Thanks to technological advancements, crime is getting more sophisticated. This means that crime investigation and prevention has to step up in order to be able to combat crime. As urbanization continues to spread across the world, even more complicated societal problems are emerging. Crime levels are also rising in urban areas (Kuo & Shih, 2018). In this fast-paced world where criminal activity is on the rise, a multiplicity of policing approaches must be employed by the police department if any success is to be realized against crime and disorder. This paper presents a case study of a selected city in the United States of America as a model of exploring how different approaches to policing can be used in the prevention and dealing with crime and disorder.

The identified district of interest for this paper is Washington DC. This is the capital city of the United States of America. In a twist of irony it also tops the nation in terms of drug and alcohol abuse levels. According to a report by the Substance Abuse and Mental health Services Administration of 2011, 11.3% of individuals of ages older than 12 were dependent on alcohol. The availability of illicit drugs in the nation’s capital is a major contributor to the menace (Smith & Alpert 2011). According to Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA), alcohol, marijuana, and cocaine are the most abused drugs in DC. SAMHSA reports that in DC, politicians, government officials and lobbyists participate in seminars, workshops, conferences and such related functions where alcohol is infused with wok. The levels of overindulgence are high but people can hardly recognize this as a problem. The availability of alcohol in virtually every quadrant of the nation’s capital is also an issue of grave concern. This paper explores a number of policing strategies that could be employed in curbing the situation.

Third party policing is used in reference to the efforts by police to persuade or coerce persons or groups believed to have a responsibility in controlling or preventing crimes to take some form of responsibility for crimes in their locality (Smith & Alpert, 2011). Some say it is a practice where police employ guardians of crime control especially in localities where crime control mechanisms were hitherto lacking (Ratcliffe & Breen, 2017). During third party policing, police will sometimes threaten action against the crime control guardians. These threats are backed by a series of laws and regulations giving police authority to engage in third party policing. Other times the approach is through a consultative process with the community members.

Hot Spot Policing

Third party policing exists in a plurality of forms. Like already stated above, in some departments, the agency might simply engage persuasive or coercive tactics against the crime control guardians in order to find solutions for crimes within their policing program. In some agencies, third party policing is established as a separate policing program (Sozer & Merlo, 2013). In such cases it’s a stand-alone section of the department and operates as an entity of the police agency e.g. the Beat Health Program in Oakland, California. A model like this could work in combating the disturbing levels of drug and alcohol abuse in DC. In California, the Beat Health Program targets rental property owners. It engages the owners of the houses in a coordinated effort to control drug-related disorder and crimes within properties they own. In other jurisdictions like Britain, forms of stand-alone third party policing units are being authorized by the state to work in conjunction with the local police in coming up with strategies to fight crime and disorder in their areas (Rosenfeld, Deckard & Blackburn, 2014). The success rates of this approach to policing are likely to be high because landlords would not wish to house people who break the law and are likely to help police in identifying and reporting them The District of Columbia would make meaningful progress in crime prevention using this approach.

In a majority of police agencies however, the third party policing approach is executed by police albeit unconsciously. It happens many times even during routine patrols.  They occur as episodes in their daily activities without the framework of any programmed intervention (Webster 2015). It occurs as ad hoc and spontaneous conversations with persons viewed by police as having responsibility over control of crime in their neighborhoods. These include individuals such as parents, bar owners and operators, property owners, and local government workers. Sometimes if not most of the time, these persons or groups of persons are responsible in a variety of ways (either directly or indirectly) for providing an environment that promotes or aggravates disorder and crime (Smith & Alpert, 2011). In normal police activity these kind of ad hoc talks occur without a systemized approach that consider ethical concerns. The police department of DC could however achieve much more through a carefully thought out third party approach that targets the aforementioned groups of people. In so doing, the department could reign in on dens responsible for the peddling of cocaine, marijuana as well as liquor stores selling alcohol to minors.

Community Policing

In employing the third party policing approach, the focal point could be people or places. Many times the policy is directed at specific groups of people e.g. in DC it would be targeted at minors who are engaged in alcohol and drug abuse. Also it will be directed at liquor stores located in the backstreet of the town where young people converge.

A number of recent studies have indicated that crime is rarely ever uniformly spread across a town landscape. Rather, crime is normally clustered in smaller geographical locations within a town or neighborhood that is responsible for the majority of the cases of disorder or crime (Simpson, 2010). This postulation is called the criminological theory. And these small clusters where criminal activity is usually concentrated are referred to as ‘hot spots’. As much as police department’s world over have for a long time known the importance of directing their energies and efforts on small areas with high crime activity, it was not until crime mapping technology was developed that the full potential of the policing strategy was unlocked. Crime mapping technology enabled police agencies to identify specific locations, streets, addresses and neighborhood that contribute highest number of crime cases. The police department in DC could use the mapping technology to identify the alcohol and drug host spots within the city.

The Hot spot Policing technique has become a very popular approach to policing globally but especially in the United States of America. According to the Police Executive Research Forum (2008) which studied 176 police agencies in the US, 90% of the agencies reported they had had success in engaging the hot spot policing strategy in targeting violent crime.  Research indicates that most other policing strategies (such as problem-oriented policing, directed patrols and proactive arrests) can be very productive if implemented in already identified hot spots (Simpson, 2010).  This approach has worked in combating crime and disorder in such a large number of police agencies in the US as indicated in the study above, it would work in DC too if well managed.

The justification for the hot spot policing strategy is that unlike most other strategies (which are heavily reliant on enhancing operational efficiency and better human resource management of officers), it is supported by theoretical perspectives on criminology. Theoretical perspectives on criminology help us to understand the role of places in how crime plays out (Sherman et al., 2014). Later, with the innovation of computer soft wares, studies have revealed that sometimes even up to half of the crime and disorder cases are done only at a few crime prone spots in the community.

Conclusion

Apart from studies that suggest criminal activities concentrated in space, there is an observation on the role of geographical places in crime (Tillyer 2018, p. 90). Places such as churches, bars and apartment buildings have been demonstrated to impact on their immediate surroundings in a number of ways (Sherman et al., 2014). This fact is tied to the cluster of people that the said facility attracts. For this reason, it’s possible that bars in DC may have attracted the drug peddling syndicates that are engaging in the sale of the illicit drugs. In response, the police department in DC should reign in on the bars, casinos and clubs as potential hot spots.

The application of the hot spot policing approach has potential to help police departments to better utilize their ever-limited resources including human resource (Hancock, 2016). This is because it enables the police agency to narrow down on a small geographical location and deploy its best human resource and logistical support there until they flush out the criminal elements. It is worth noting that critics of the hot spot policing strategy argue that it has potential to yield another phenomenon; displacement (Gayadeen & Phillips, 2014). Displacement is a situation where criminal elements migrate to locations that are not covered by police activity. However, existing research shows that that there is higher possibility of the benefits of police interventions diffusing into the neighboring areas.

Community Policing

This theory of law enforcement was coined in the late 20^th Century in the US. For a long time, the US police operated within a model that was called the Professional Model. This was characterized by respected hierarchical establishments accompanied by strict protocol on procedures (Sozer & Merlo, 2013). Immediate response to emergency calls was prioritized. As the century progressed, societal ills became more rampant yielding more disorder and crime. The department working together with the local government had to reexamine their approach and role in the management of public safety (Kimbrough, 2016). They resolved to adopt a more participatory process that would involve the community and foster better relationships between the police agencies and the citizens. The theory behind this approach is that criminal elements live within the community. They are people who are generally known to the locals as friends, neighbors and relatives. Moreover criminal activities and acts of social disorder occur within the societal setting. It is only natural that an approach that incorporates the community would be effective in combating crime.

There is no standardized strategy when it comes to community policing. And community policing is not strictly a program in the natural sense of the word; rather it is a philosophy, a theory that informs the way of thinking. It is a system that directs the course of action towards improving public safety. Nevertheless community policing can be categorized into the following three types

1. Organizational Transformation
2. Community Partnership
3. Problem Solving

This is the initial requirement if a community policing strategy is to be successful. Changes ought to be made in the structure and operation of the department. The changes could include the organizational structure, information technology systems and personnel practices among others. The major argument is that geographically based assignments are more effective in the realization of better community placing results (Bain, Robinson & Conser, 2014). This is attributable to the fact that such assignments enable time to time contact between the community and the police officers. Frequent contact consequently is believed to help the officer to better know the needs and concerns of the community they work in.

Partnering with the members of the community is essential to the success of community policing (Groff et al., 2015). By taking the example of police departments that have demonstrated commitment to community policing, the police department of DC can jointly with community tackle the problem of drug and alcohol abuse together. This approach has to bring in individuals as well as groups such as faith based organizations, nonprofit organizations, business associations, tenant welfare associations, social service providers and learning institutions. With this number of individuals and organizations aiding the police with information sharing and collaborative strategies, the DC police department will succeed against the drug menace

This is an approach that emphasizes prevention of crime rather than reacting to it. It is proactive and aims at identifying the problems and addressing the issues that are pertinent to criminal conduct. Also called Problem-Oriented-Policing, the approach promotes officers working with community members and analysts to pinpoint the causal agents of the societal problems and address them. Police agencies that excel in community policing develop capacity in police officers to unpick problems and solve them (Sozer & Merlo, 2013. This is what needs to be done by the DC police.

Conclusion

The world today is fast changing. The natures of crimes are complex and sophisticated. Urbanization has yielded increased levels of societal problems. This state of social degradation has resulted in a society where social disorder and crime is ever on the rise. Police efforts to combat crime have to respond to these needs. Drug and alcohol abuse is a major concern for the officers. More and more young people are getting involved in the vice. Overcoming the problem will require the police agencies to employ strategies that are multi-pronged rather than a single policing approach. Community involvement is vital to the success of all these efforts because crime occurs within the setting of society so preventing it must involve society as well.

References

Bain, A., Robinson, B. K., & Conser, J. (2014). Perceptions of policing: improving communication in local communities. International Journal Of Police Science & Management, 16(4), 267-276. doi:10.1350/ijps.2014.16.4.345

Gayadeen, S. M., & Phillips, S. W. (2014). The innovation of community policing and the COPS Office: does diffusion of innovation theory hold in a manipulated environment?. International Journal of Police Science & Management, 16(3), 228-242. doi:10.1350/ijps.2014.16.3.34214556736

Groff, E. R., Ratcliffe, J. H., Haberman, C. P., Sorg, E. T., Joyce, N. M., & Taylor, R. B. (2015). Does What Police Do At Hot Spots Matter? Theo Philadelphia Policing Tactics Experiment*. Criminology, 53(1), 23-53. doi:10.1111/1745-9125.12055

Hancock, K. (2016). Community policing within campus law enforcement agencies. Police Practice & Research, 17(5), 463-476.

Kimbrough, C. (2016). Building Bridges: Community Policing for the 21st Century. National Civic Review, 105(4), 3-13. doi:10.1002/ncr.21296

Kuo, S., & Shih, Y. (2018). An Evaluation of a Community-Oriented Policing Program in Taiwan. International Journal Of Offender Therapy & Comparative Criminology, 62(7), 2016-2044. doi:10.1177/0306624X17703719

Ratcliffe, J. H., & Breen, C. (2011). Crime Diffusion and Displacement: Measuring the Side Effects of Police Operations. Professional Geographer, 63(2), 230-243. doi:10.1080/00330124.2010.547154

Rosenfeld, R., Deckard, M. J., & Blackburn, E. (2014). The Effects Of Directed Patrol And Self-Initiated Enforcement On Firearm Violence: A Randomized Controlled Study Of Hot Spot Policing.

Sherman, L. W., Williams, S., Ariel, B., Strang, L. R., Wain, N., Slothower, M., & Norton, A. (2014). An Integrated Theory of Hot Spots Patrol Strategy: Implementing Prevention by Scaling Up and Feeding Back. Journal Of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 30(2), 95-122. doi:10.1177/1043986214525082

Simpson, S. R. (2010). Case Study of “Hot-Spot” Apartment Complexes in North Central Indianapolis. Journal Of The Indiana Academy Of The Social Sciences, 14126-139. Criminology, 52(3), 428-449. doi:10.1111/1745-9125.12043

Smith, H. P., & Alpert, G. P. (2011). Joint policing: third parties and the use of force. Police Practice & Research, 12(2), 136-147. doi:10.1080/15614263.2010.508987

Sozer, M. A., & Merlo, A. V. (2013). The impact of community policing on crime rates: does the effect of community policing differ in large and small law enforcement agencies?. Police Practice & Research, 14(6), 506-521. doi:10.1080/15614263.2012.661151

Tillyer, R. (2018). Assessing the Impact of Community-oriented Policing on Arrest. JQ: Justice Quarterly, 35(3), 526-555. doi:10.1080/07418825.2017.1327609

Uluturk, B., Guler, A., & Karakaya, M. (2017). Police Officers’ Attitudes Toward the Implementation of Community-Oriented Policing in Turkey. Crime & Delinquency, 63(14), 1946-1967. doi:10.1177/00111287

Webster, J. (2015). Effective third-party policing partnerships or missed opportunities? Policing & Society, 25(1), 97-114. doi:10.1080/10439463.2013.817994