Introduction to System Thinking

Discuss about the General Management System and Culture.

System thinking can be stated like a proper kind of breakthrough which is generally used for having a proper understanding the complex environment of the world. Domain or given field name is considered to be different for large number of system. It is mainly used for proper establishment of given relationship in various kinds of available subsystem (Boehm & Mobasser, 2015). The idea or concept of subsystem is mainly used for having a proper kind of understanding about the given fact that how it can greatly influence various can changes that can easily affect the challenges that can easily occur within a given organization. System analysis can be defined as the application of large number of theories. One of the biggest kind of tool which is mainly available for analysis of system is its proper thinking (Chunlin & Chan, 2015).  The total view of proper analysing of tool is the large number of problem which can be easily encountered in a given organization. System thinking generally comes up with various kinds of tools that is generally used for proper kind of idea for different kind of ideas in various system.

The upcoming pages of the essay a concept of general management system, culture and culture of the given organization in proper kind of relation to the proper kind of system thinking. Apart from this the concept of risk management has been discussed in brief. Various other aspects like business value, portfolio management and organizational maturity has been discussed in brief.

System thinking is stated like a proper method of thoughtful tool that is properly used in establishing communication with different complexities and along with dependencies. A proper list has been prepared which is mainly used for proper kind of analysis of various kinds of parameter (Dalkin & Lhussier, 2016). Instead of linear value, the language of system which is generally considered to be an important aspect. It can easily affect a large number of dependencies which is mainly used for discussing various kinds of aspects like effect of x and y. A large number of tools is mainly used for various kinds of loop diagram and given behaviour over the given period of time. It mainly aims in providing a proper kind of aspects which is mainly used for providing of the given aspect in the period of time. It is mainly used for having a proper kind of structure which is mainly used for clarification of various aspects in different kinds of aspects. It is mainly used for clarifying different kinds of problems which can be easily used for having proper kind of structure of given report (Eilam & Reisfeld, 2017). The whole thing can be easily achieved by proper summation of the given concise and clear methods which can be used for holding different kind of methods. The whole kind of thing can be achieved by proper addition it both the methods in both concise and clear kind of tools which are generally available for use.  A proper kind of diagram is generally used for establishing proper communication by the help of large number of issues which can be easily used for overcoming the way when it tends to remembered to be easily.

Tools and Techniques used in System Analysis

System thinking can be considered to be as an important tool which is generally used for proper kind of changes which are taking place around the tool. The ultimate application of organization thinking is mainly managing the organization and various kinds of changes which are stated in early nineteen’s (Hirsch, Shepardson & Roychoudhury, 2017). It mainly comes up with proper kind of tool and method that is mainly used for reconfiguration and upgrading the productivity of the production of the given organization. Organization can easily make use of certain number of tools which helps in having a proper kind of idea that is mainly used various kinds of changes in the organization and how various kinds of things are related to it (Ika, 2014). It ultimately focuses on proper development and other kinds of effective methods or ways which can be easily used for proper kind of solution which can easily result in impact which can be result in positive and negative in nature. It comes up with large number of benefits like proper kinds of optimization of large number of things, solving of problem, idea from 3-D dimensional, making changes from linear nature to circular, interconnection and in the end the proper kind of connectivity.

Optimizing properly: By the help of dynamics in a system the related optimization can be considered to be proper kind of solution to the given problem which needs to be addressed in a proper way (Keynan, Assaraf & Goldman, 2014). It mainly stresses on the fact that different types of organization along with individual can gather proper kind of benefits from various kinds of part which are mainly present in the given system. 

Loving of problem: Despite of avoiding of large number of issues which can be encountered in various kinds of system thinkers for having a proper kind of concept about different kind of opportunity and issues which is being offered to large number of people and development in creative field (Twisk et al., 2015).

Perspective of 3-D: It is considered to be proper kind of system approach tool which is mainly used for analysing the given network along with ecosystem and is much on individual kind of part which is mainly provided in general.

Linear to circular nature: Various kinds of system which are provided are mainly considered to be very much linear value in nature (Liu, Forrest & Yang, 2015). A proper kind of approach for system is mainly used for circulation of different kinds of products which are available. It is mainly used for proper kinds of analysis of different kind of service which are available to large number of people.

Benefits of System Thinking

Interconnection: Various kinds of things which are provided in nature is mainly used for establishment of interconnection of various needs of human along with given access. System thinking mainly creates a platform for various kinds of tools and techniques which is mainly is used for performing various kinds of practices.

Creativity: With growth in number of development of connectivity for various kinds of dynamic nature of this organization. Various kinds of creativity come up into action. It can be also defined as a proper kind of method which is mainly used for overcoming various kinds of issues or problem (Morandi et al., 2014).  System thinking is considered to be much useful in activation of neurological development which is mainly used for enabling the dynamic nature and diversion kind of thinking.

system thinking tools are taken to be a useful kind of tool which is mainly used for minimizing various kinds of risk in project along with problems. It is mainly stated as a complex kind of thing which is generally used for complex managing of different kind of project that is mainly used for efficient method for overcoming large problems which are complex in nature (Mutale et al., 2016). Efficiency of risk management is generally taken to be an important part which is mainly used for establishment of framework that is mainly used for management at large scale. At present various kinds of research in the domain in the project management is helpful for checking requirement of the project. It is mainly used for analysing various methodologies and aspects which can be tackling large number of problems.

Forecasting can be easily defined as a vital tool or technique which can be used for having an analysis of different kind of techniques based on risk management in the world of project management (Nordby et al., 2016). Currently there are various kinds of tools for proper management of project by considering various aspects like analysis of cost benefit and growing demand for cost. Some of the major kind of tool and technique used for understanding price and challenges which can easily result in gathering of benefits which can be gathered from the given project.

Design of system thinking and proper management of portfolio is used for having an understanding of various kinds of problems in relation to large number of context which needs to be defined properly. Increase in amount of stakeholders generally helps in having much kind of understanding of different kind of problem along with providing requirements with the aim in increasing the value (Ostuzzi, Dejonghe & Detand, 2017). Proper anticipation of planning aims in having a proper kind of idea which is mainly used for checking different problems. It is also aim in providing scope with various kinds of complexity of a project which needs to be addressed in a proper way.

Application of System Thinking in Project Management

Innovation of process can be easily attained by proper kind of identification of different kind of tool which are mainly available and along with it needs to address the problem. It generally checks various ways which is needed for improvisation of system which is needed for proper kind of progress (Roychoudhury, Shepardson & Hirsch, 2017). Different types of system and factors are mainly used for analysing the change in control. It mainly comes up proper kind of method which is needed for tacking various aspects of given project.

System thinking when its works with planning phase mainly checks different kinds of problem which is needed to be taken care of. Risk planning can be easily defined as a proper kind of method which is used for checking various factors. It mainly aims in tackling any kind of consequence that is mainly used for tackling various kinds of ways (Sharma & Matheson, 2016). When system is properly attached with portfolio management can be easily considered to help in overcoming large number of objectives in a given project.  

The whole concept of Eco cycle is all about dealing with proper kind of idea which is all about research on various complexities of various system. Research can be considered to be an effective kind of tool which is mainly used for dealing with large number of problems (Suomi et al., 2017). Mapping of ecocycle can be defined as a proper kind of tool which is mainly used for plotting of organization in various kinds of aspects like effort which is mainly used for proper kind of management of available framework.

The project manager of Deep Horizon and Texas city should follow six steps for tackling of various kinds of problems:

• Proper narration of whole story of the project for the given team members.
• Providing a graph for behaviour over time.
• Proper identification of given structure of the report
• Addressing a large number structure of the given project.
• Proper planning of intervention.

The above discussion relates us to the fact the essay mainly deals with system thinking. The above essay has been prepared by the help of large number of sources. A proper concept has been provided that how various kinds of system thinking tools can be used for providing help to large number of person. System thinking tool can be stated as a proper kind of tool which comprises of large number of things like overall structure, pattern and different kind of tools and techniques. The above pages of the essay manly discuss various kinds of aspects like general management system, structure of organization, management of risk, value for given business and maturity of organization has been discussed in brief.

References

Boehm, B., & Mobasser, S. K. (2015, May). System thinking: educating t-shaped software engineers. In Proceedings of the 37th International Conference on Software Engineering-Volume 2 (pp. 333-342). IEEE Press.

Chunlin, G. U. O., & Chan, C. C. (2015). Whole-system thinking, development control, key barriers and promotion mechanism for EV development. Journal of Modern Power Systems and Clean Energy, 3(2), 160-169.

Dalkin, S., & Lhussier, M. (2016). Exploring the possibility of explicitly combining realist and system thinking: an exemplar.

Eilam, B., & Reisfeld, D. (2017). A Curriculum Unit for Promoting Complex System Thinking: The Case of Combined System Dynamics and Agent Based Models for Population Growth. Journal of Advances in Education Research, 2(2).

Hirsch, A. S., Shepardson, D. P., & Roychoudhury, A. (2017). System Thinking and Teaching in the Context of Climate System and Climate Change. In Teaching and Learning about Climate Change (pp. 45-58). Routledge.

Ika, L. P. (2014). Toward Systems Thinking in Ethical Management to the Enviroment: A Solution for Conflict of Interest. KARYA DOSEN Fakultas Ekonomi UM.

Keynan, A., Assaraf, O. B. Z., & Goldman, D. (2014). The repertory grid as a tool for evaluating the development of students’ ecological system thinking abilities. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 41, 90-105.

Liu, S., Forrest, J., & Yang, Y. (2015). Grey system: thinking, methods, and models with applications. Contemporary Issues in Systems Science and Engineering, 888.

Morandi, M. I. W. M., Rodrigues, L. H., Lacerda, D. P., & Pergher, I. (2014). Foreseeing iron ore prices using system thinking and scenario planning. Systemic Practice and Action Research, 27(3), 287-306.

Mutale, W., Balabanova, D., Chintu, N., Mwanamwenge, M. T., & Ayles, H. (2016). Application of system thinking concepts in health system strengthening in low?income settings: a proposed conceptual framework for the evaluation of a complex health system intervention: the case of the BHOMA intervention in Zambia. Journal of evaluation in clinical practice, 22(1), 112-121.

Nordby, A., Øygardslia, K., Sverdrup, U., & Sverdrup, H. (2016). The art of gamification; teaching sustainability and system thinking by pervasive game development. Academic Conferences and Publishing International Limited.

Ostuzzi, F., Dejonghe, W., & Detand, J. (2017). Open-ended Design as Second-order Design. A case study of teaching Cybernetics and System Thinking to Industrial Design students. In Relating Systems Thinking and Design (RSD6) 2017 Symposium (pp. 127-129). Systemic Design Research Network.

Roychoudhury, A., Shepardson, D. P., & Hirsch, A. S. (2017). SYSTEM THINKING AND TEACHING IN THE CONTEXT OF CLIMATE SYSTEM AND CLIMATE CHANGE. Teaching and Learning about Climate Change: A Framework for Educators, 29.

Sharma, S. R., & Matheson, A. (2016). Systems thinking in 21st century: a call to health promoters. Health Prospect, 15(2), 1-2.

Suomi, R., Li, H., Nykänen, P., Wickramasinghe, N., Widén, G., & Häyrinen, K. (2017). WIS 2016: Special Issue on:“System thinking in eHealth and eWelfare”. Finnish Journal of eHealth and eWelfare, 9(4), 262-263.

Twisk, D., Commandeur, J. J., Bos, N., Shope, J. T., & Kok, G. (2015). Quantifying the influence of safe road systems and legal licensing age on road mortality among young adolescents: Steps towards system thinking. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 74, 306-313.